Driverless cars on UK roads soon.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Gravity Aided

Legendary Member
Location
Land of Lincoln
I think the best thing about driverless cars is that people will probably be in less of a rush, why rush to work when you can have a laptop in your car, eat your breakfast on the drive whilst watching tv or reading the paper. people then wouldn't get annoyed waiting at a junction, waiting at red lights or waiting behind a cyclist, to be honest they probably wouldnt even realise! the problem is going to be (as someone has already mentioned) is when you only have a few driverless cars! people will be overtaking them because they will do the exact speed limit or are waiting behind something.
Or ride a bus or trolley.
 

GrasB

Veteran
Location
Nr Cambridge
I think the best thing about driverless cars is that people will probably be in less of a rush, why rush to work when you can have a laptop in your car, eat your breakfast on the drive whilst watching tv or reading the paper. people then wouldn't get annoyed waiting at a junction, waiting at red lights or waiting behind a cyclist, to be honest they probably wouldnt even realise! the problem is going to be (as someone has already mentioned) is when you only have a few driverless cars! people will be overtaking them because they will do the exact speed limit or are waiting behind something.
People get impatient & thus annoyed on trains & buses when they don't run to time tables. The difference is they can't affect the style of driving as they're not in control. One question would be should you be unable to take manual control of these cars under normal traffic conditions?
 

dexter101

Well-Known Member
People get annoyed on trains because they spend the journey squashed next to someone else, unable to work on laptops as their isnt room or wi fi and generally its an uncomfortable, expensive and late means of transport. if I could be sat in my car on my commute as if i was still at home (ie relaxing) I wouldnt have a care in the world.
 
If driverless cars means the reduction of taxi drivers in my home town of Birmingham with an irrational chip on their shoulder towards cyclists, then I am all for it. Occupants vomiting over the upholstery or refusing to pay could be driven to the nearest old bill, no problems with unlicensed, non crb checked drivers working on the side (a serious issue in Birmingham), potentially safer for female passengers too, no bumping up the charges, no drivers smoking or talking on the phone whilst driving, no having to listen to whatever crap music the driver happens to like.

A no brainer in my opinion. Bring on driverless taxis.
 
There's one befit of driverless cars that hasn't been mentioned yet. If you want a wife free weekend all you have to do is lock her in the car and program it to spend the whole weekend driving around the nearest roundabout.
 

Vapin' Joe

Formerly known as Smokin Joe
No need to find a parking space either. Just send it round the block for half hour while you visit the massage parlour do your shopping.
 

w00hoo_kent

One of the 64K
I'm guessing there will be a pretty big step between driverless cars and unoccupied driverless cars. While in theory the two are as safe as each other I could see people being much more willing to accept a car where a human could get involved if need be (if only to say 'stop') than one with no humans in at all (especially if they also have a 'skynet' sticker on them. For reference, if I ever have one, it'll have a 'skynet' sticker on it.)
 
If the owner of the car was stopped by the police and found to be completely ratarsed, would he be exempt from drunk driving.
 

benb

Evidence based cyclist
Location
Epsom
Drat, so you won't (yet) be able to go out on the lash and get your car to pick you up and take you home.
 
Top Bottom