the snail
Guru
- Location
- Chippenham
raw steel 1.3kg! my smugness is reaching dangerous levels
If I don't drive, how far do I have to pedal then?

This sort of calculation, trying to calculate a CO2 emission factor for cycling based on food consumption, is extremely dubious, as it assumes that people will eat additional food in proportional to the distance they cycle. That is an extremely bad assumption. The amount people eat is affected by a far greater range of variables than the amount of physical activity undertaken, especially when talking about the relatively short distances typical of cycling to work for example. Imagine a situation where you have two people who eat exactly the same amount of food, and have the same distance commutes, but one drives and the other cycles. If you count part of the cyclists' food as a transport emission, where do you count the CO2 in the driver's food? Unless food consumption really can be shown to have a direct relationship with distance, its associated emissions ought not be counted as transport emissions. They shouldn't be ignored of course, but are far more logically accounted for in the carbon budgets for agriculture and food production.
I love all this hypothesising and mental mathdurbating, but all you've managed to demonstrate to me so far is that the future of green transport is probably the horse![]()
Next - the average life expectancy of a cyclist is reported to be 2 years more than that of a non cyclist (see where this is going?).
Carbon footprint of a person living in Britain, for 2 years?
Don't forget that it counts against the bike!
More seriously I strongly suspect that if you look at the embedded carbon in a car it's loads more than any bike.
I love all this hypothesising and mental mathdurbating, but all you've managed to demonstrate to me so far is that the future of green transport is probably the horse![]()
Although (as mentioend in that other story), there is a likliehood that a regular cyclist will have a lower carbon lifestyle than a non cyclist, thus negating the extra years.
Oh, and here's a thing. Which is lower carbon, being fit and healthy, or being unfit and unhealthy. Carbon footprint of hospitals and statins?
cool! Or.....and bear in mind that there's likely to be less of the cyclist.Let's really look on the bright side. The longer you live, the better the carbon scrubbers will be on the crematorium exhaust pipe.![]()
... not to mention the carbon cost of all those bloody cyclists computers on the Internet .... discussing carbon footprints ....
I love all this hypothesising and mental mathdurbating, but all you've managed to demonstrate to me so far is that the future of green transport is probably the horse![]()