Stop thinking about silk or nylon panties, Keith!Keith Oates said:I understand what you're saying AH, but having lycra cycling shorts with good padding is probably more 'protective' than walking around with cotton shorts and silk or nylon panties!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jake said:some guys just dont look good in lycra. For me personaly, i dont mind seeing slim fit guys cycling in lycra, but when your stuck behind an elephant in lycra with sides splitting, flesh hanging out, or trying to escape, as he huffs and puffs on his mountain bike, it does make one feel quesy
ianrauk said:VPL? FCN? WTF?
J4CKO said:VPL, visible panty line, outline of undergarments seen through outer garments
FCN, Food Chain Number, I thought that would be well known on here seeing as that is where I heard about it from, basically, depending on your bike, its accesories and your attire you allocate, based on defined rules (google FCN) you are allocated your position in cycling's pecking order, your position in cycling's food chain, its a kind of handicap system to level the playfield for impromptu road races with other cyclists, for example a baggy clad MTBer beating a Lycra Roadie, in full team colours would be an epic victory due to the disparity in their respective FCN's, with the Roadie being very high and the MTB'er being comparatively low.
WTF, What the F*ck, an abbreviation used to express surprise on internet forums.
Hope this helps.
J4CKO
J4CKO said:Glad about that, my wife made me feel a bit pervy going commando but now the Cyclechat collective has spoken, it is officially expected to not wear pants underneath Lycra.
Wasnt uncomfortable, going without does tend to make you feel like you are walking round starkers though.
Here's me racking my brain trying to figure it out...would never have got that in a thousand years. Food Chain Number! Wot a cop-out. I want a refund.J4CKO said:FCN, Food Chain Number