First self driving (reported) fatality

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
The first fatality was in July 2016 when a Tesla tried to drive through a lorry trailer, the car was in auto mode.
 
Last edited:

classic33

Leg End Member
Heard a discussion about this on R4 the other day. First pedestrian fatality caused by a car was 1896 or thereabouts. Hit by a car at 4mph. The coroner at the time said it must never be allowed to happen again.

Interviewee said, and I paraphrase, at that point we could have decided to stop development of the motor vehicle but we've basically decided as a society to accept a certain amount of collateral damage.

Irish scientist Mary Ward, was run over by a steam-powered car in 1869 in County Down, possibly making her the first auto-traffic victim in history.

(Source: Citystreets.org, Wikipedia)
 
 

Bazzer

Setting the controls for the heart of the sun.
[QUOTE 5196822, member: 45"]That suggests that the standard Volvo collision avoidance system had been disabled so that the separate Uber avoidance system could be tested.[/QUOTE]

Yes, that is what is referred to here.



Whilst Uber appear to have truly shot themselves in the foot with this, I don't see the issue of self driving cars going away.
 

Bazzer

Setting the controls for the heart of the sun.
Seems like Tesla also employ f**kwits
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43604440

Such gems as:
"The driver had received several visual and one audible hands-on warning earlier in the drive," a statement on the company's website said.

"The driver's hands were not detected on the wheel for six seconds prior to the collision."

"The driver had about five seconds and 150m (490ft) of unobstructed view of the concrete divider... but the vehicle logs show that no action was taken," the statement added."..........
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
"It led the company to introduce new safety measures, including turning off Autopilot and bringing the car to a halt if the driver lets go of the wheel for too long."

So how long is too long for Tesla's dead man's handle to activate the brake?
 

SkipdiverJohn

Deplorable Brexiteer
Location
London
This just proves my point about humans becoming bored and losing concentration if asked to do a non-stimulating, tedious task like watching a machine in case it malfunctions. Also keeping your hands on the steering wheel of a vehicle when someone/something else is actually doing the steering is an unnatural action, IMHO. If someone managed to design a self-propelling, self-steering bike with a "safety rider" just sitting on the saddle as a passenger, you would soon get a spate of "offs" as their attention would wander and if the bike failed, by the time they were shaken back to an alert state, any human reaction would come too late.
There is also the issue of the judgement and motor control skills needed to pilot any kind of vehicle. When we drive a car (or ride a bike), we are constantly using the experiences we encounter on a journey as feedback that maintains and improves our skills. The more miles we cover the better we become because our brain receives more and more information. Take away the need for a human to have those skills in order not to crash their car or fall off their bike, and those skills won't be there when they are needed. Imagine sticking an aircraft pilot and co-pilot in the cockpit of a plane they had no actual experience of flying under manual control. If the autopilot failed they would have no stored experience in their heads from which to draw on to take over manually. They would be no better than grabbing a random passenger out of the cabin and asking them to fly the plane. For this reason I believe that self-driving vehicles are just a non-starter, except in a closed environment that excludes humans and animals from coming into contact with the vehicles.
 
Top Bottom