Cycling Badger
Regular
I was watching a GCN video yesterday where the presenters were doing an “experiment” on climbing.
In the video Dan was explaining why weight and gravity have such impact when going uphill.
He stated that at the dead points in the crank rotation forward momentum is reduced and gravity drags the bike back.
My thought was it therefore must be quicker to climb seated and with concerted effort to circle the feet, not stamp of the pedals.
I then read a comment in this forum (and I think I’ve read similar others)
To the point of the post …
I hypothesise that fixed gear bikes encourage a smother more continual power delivery, reducing the span of the dead points in the crank revolutions.
This has the consequence of reducing the yo-yo effect of gravity and forward propulsion.
Just a thought exercise, interested in views of others in the forum?
Does anyone have any experimental evidence to support or refute the hypothesis?
In the video Dan was explaining why weight and gravity have such impact when going uphill.
He stated that at the dead points in the crank rotation forward momentum is reduced and gravity drags the bike back.
My thought was it therefore must be quicker to climb seated and with concerted effort to circle the feet, not stamp of the pedals.
I then read a comment in this forum (and I think I’ve read similar others)
@rogerzilla from threadFixies get uphill in a most astounding fashion
To the point of the post …
I hypothesise that fixed gear bikes encourage a smother more continual power delivery, reducing the span of the dead points in the crank revolutions.
This has the consequence of reducing the yo-yo effect of gravity and forward propulsion.
Just a thought exercise, interested in views of others in the forum?
Does anyone have any experimental evidence to support or refute the hypothesis?