Racing roadkill
Guru
I have the saddle angled down by about 6 degrees on my Fizik Arione saddle, as it has a very flat profile, I have a Selle Royal with a more contoured profile which I can ride with it set flat.
So in other words you're saying the tilt adjustability is so it fits the rider. Which is what I just said.![]()
Saves on condoms.Most of my Brooks saddles are slightly 'nose up'.![]()
Although as I said earlier, tilt is generally a sign that you are compensating for fit issues elsewhere. Colin's video link earlier kind of makes that point. Although for some reason, you said that 'wasn't strictly true'![]()
You seem to want it both ways. A tilt is a compensator, whichever way you look at it. Not all slammed bikes have tilted saddles.For the average everyday cyclist, saddle tilt is not an issue. It is part of the setup. An issue is something that happens when setup isn't working very well. Such as a slammed stem. Which is what Colin's video link refers to.![]()
I think that is a classic case of a 'compensator'!I favour slightly nose down but angle the nose a couple of degrees left on all my saddles. No idea why this works best. Mebbe my anatomy is non standard tho' nobody has ever commented or complained.
I think that story relates to just GB women...I was mainly referring to the pro tour riders. The angle regs may now have been relaxed, but you only have to look at a few pro bike setups to see that pretty much nobody runs a saddle anything other than flat (maybe give or take a degree or two).
In the GCN video mentioned above, the presenter actually went round looking at pro team bikes and found lots of them with significantly tilted saddles.
As for why - extreme 'stem slamming'!
Hang on, I just found the video ...
The report by British Cycling physiotherapist Phil Burt states that the problem concerns both men and Women.
See below:
"One of the major contributing factors to saddle discomfort and health issues we did discover was the UCI ruling that saddles were only allowed a tilt of less than 2.5 degrees with a 0.5 degree margin of error. We presented our findings to the UCI and they have since increased the angle of tilt to nine degrees with a tolerance of one degree. This has had a major impact on rider health, for both men and women, across the sport."
Link.
https://www.britishcycling.org.uk/knowledge/article/izn20160510-Set-up-Women%E2%80%99s-saddle-issues-0
That fits in with my experience.BCF article said:Where is your soreness?
Where you feel sore can give vital clues to the cause of your discomfort.
...
- Unilateral (one sided) soreness indicates a possible asymmetry, such as a leg length discrepancy. This needs to be professionally assessed and diagnosed with a physiotherapist led bike fit.
The report by British Cycling physiotherapist Phil Burt states that the problem concerns both men and Women.
See below:
"One of the major contributing factors to saddle discomfort and health issues we did discover was the UCI ruling that saddles were only allowed a tilt of less than 2.5 degrees with a 0.5 degree margin of error. We presented our findings to the UCI and they have since increased the angle of tilt to nine degrees with a tolerance of one degree. This has had a major impact on rider health, for both men and women, across the sport."
Link.
https://www.britishcycling.org.uk/knowledge/article/izn20160510-Set-up-Women%E2%80%99s-saddle-issues-0
As I said before - that link relates to GB women.