ozboz
Guru
- Location
- Richmond ,Surrey
Was a good game , but I’d rather Belgium would have won,but in the event on Sunday........couldn’t get much better than to beat France !,,,
Seconded! Well apart from the money bit.....A game worthy of a final.
Pace and skill with a lot of passion displayed by both sides.
France deserved their victory.
And it was only a tenner I lost.
A game worthy of a final.
Pace and skill with a lot of passion displayed by both sides.
France deserved their victory.
And it was only a tenner I lost.
The biggest difference for me tonight was DeBruyne had a bad game.
I feel a little sorry for Lukaku as he had no service.I think they really missed Meunier at the back as well. And Lukaku was a bit anonymous.
It wasn't that they played badly, because they didn't, but everything was just a little bit "off"
Don't worry.I feel really old. I was talking to someone at work today about how the 1990 World Cup was the first that I was able to watch in the pub. Then I realised my girlfriend wasn't even born at the time.
England will beat France, they've had their best game!
I've a good mind to support Engalnd in the final
Me neither, but I'll still support England and the way our luck has gone we would still have a chance.I don't think even England are good enough to win a game between France and Croatia.![]()
Badly reported by the beeb, but I think what they meant was, “Tonight’s game (Belgium v France) is the first semi final between bordering nations since France v West Germany in 1986”.Italy played France in the 2006 final too.
It's quite a strange bit of reporting.