FPN for carrying child on bike

[MissTillyFlop]

The type I had was like the one on the back but with armrests, standing like that if you hit a bump she could be bounced off, no headgear?

More to the point, if I was the kid, I'd be wailing "why do YOU get to sit down and I don't???!!! Arse bumholes!!!!"

 

[twobiker]

More to the point, if I was the kid, I'd be wailing "why do YOU get to sit down and I don't???!!! Arse bumholes!!!!"

She would stop the flies though and if you put a rucksack on her she could carry the shopping.

 

[MissTillyFlop]

She would stop the flies though and if you put a rucksack on her she could carry the shopping.

True dat, as they say round these parts.

I was an exceptionally lazy child, I made my mum carry my baby brother so I could go in the pram - when I was 3 1/2

 

[MissTillyFlop]

Also, what is the point of having that...erm...thing, when there is a seat at the back?

Is there a phantom baby?

 

[twobiker]

Also, what is the point of having that...erm...thing, when there is a seat at the back?

Is there a phantom baby?

Its for her daughters imaginary friend.

 

[Vikeonabike]

To issue a ticket otherwise then takes us back into the era of people being arrested because the police didn't like the look of 'em.

Did I miss something, are we not doing that any more? Booger. So no more tickets for wearing loud shirts in a built up area after dark then?

Does that mean that Section 69 of the Ways and Means Act of 1658 and Section 13 of the UnLucky act 1971 have been repealed...?

 

[twobiker]

Did I miss something, are we not doing that any more? Booger. So no more tickets for wearing loud shirts in a built up area after dark then?

Does that mean that Section 69 of the Ways and Means Act of 1658 and Section 13 of the UnLucky act 1971 have been repealed...?

Remember the comedy where the guy got done for having an offensive wife....classic. Derek Guyler was the best tv policeman.

 

[Angelfishsolo]

Did I miss something, are we not doing that any more? Booger. So no more tickets for wearing loud shirts in a built up area after dark then?

Does that mean that Section 69 of the Ways and Means Act of 1658 and Section 13 of the UnLucky act 1971 have been repealed...?

Me finks so guv'nor.

 

[User169]

Noticed the bloke over the road had one of these strapped to the back of his bike today....

Not sure if he was planning to put his daughter in it.

 

[Red Light]

Did I miss something, are we not doing that any more? Booger. So no more tickets for wearing loud shirts in a built up area after dark then?

Does that mean that Section 69 of the Ways and Means Act of 1658 and Section 13 of the UnLucky act 1971 have been repealed...?

Yep, all replaced by the And That One in the Spotlight, He Don't Look Right to Me. Get Him Up Against the Wall Act 1979

 

[Red Light]

Noticed the bloke over the road had one of these strapped to the back of his bike today....

Not sure if he was planning to put his daughter in it.

Is it a baby mincer?

 

[twobiker]

Noticed the bloke over the road had one of these strapped to the back of his bike today....

Not sure if he was planning to put his daughter in it.

Gonna need another roll of Gaffa tape

 

[subaqua]

Gonna need another a bigger roll of Gaffa tape

FTFY

 

[Ian 74]

Gonna need another roll of Gaffa tape

 

[Red Light]

You seem to have an issue with the Police. It went to court (outside the control of the police) and he was found / pleaded guilty. This is how the judicial system works. He has the right of appeal.

And this is how the police sometimes work

"The judge decided that the police officer's evidence lacked credibility"

P.S He has no right of appeal unfortunately. Appeals cannot be heard on matters of fact, only of process, unless new evidence has come to light that was not available at the time. Since he has pleaded guilty and the legal situation on adapted bikes for two was available even if the defendant didn't know it, he has no chance in getting an appeal allowed.