1581081 said:That's quite enough of the pseudo religious bollocks.
I'm sure I heard John Humphrys say that on the Today programme, as he cut short Thought For The Day. Mind you, I have had a bang on the head.
1581081 said:That's quite enough of the pseudo religious bollocks.
1581076 said:Where were we? Bruce's photos show the clock on the church of St Mary of Charity Faversham, where I almost had a Damascene moment, at 8:05 so I guess we would have been just out of Sittingbourne.
Five punctures, one of which was Davy's failure to repair the first one properly with a patch that just missed the actual hole!
I've got a GPX track, which I'll edit, upload and post a link to one of the mapping sites, eventually!btw, I was running two different tracking programs, and they messed up in two different ways: does anyone have a gpx track of the journey from Chatham to Teynham?
I can cycle "hands off", and certainly do sometimes to eat, drink, or take photos, although it's a skill which should be used very carefully in group rides, because a sudden requirement to brake, when you've got no hands on the handlebars at all is a bit of a recipe for disaster. On last years first Martletts ride I almost came undone when, even though we were near the back with very few cyclists, someone suddenly braked, and I was trying to take a photo. I did manage to get a hand back on the handlebars and brake before I hit anyone (or anyone went into me), but it was close!... I had two (thankfully minor) mechanicals - Sheldon thingy research to follow - as the chain keeps coming off. ...
- And as far the most supreme Look Mum No Hands (I'm unpacking my backpack, retrieving my Canon Sureshot, changing lenses, film, sending a few emails etc etc) whilst travelling quite fast down a hill towards a roundabout - I was so gobsmacked I nearly crashed into the pavement just watching (I am definitely a newbie). I am sure many people I cycle with can Look Mum No Hands too (User10571 can eat a banana, Topcat1 can take pics and Adrian can wave!) but I have never witnessed it quite like that. It was - fantastic (and am slightly envious!)
I can't remember exactly when/where any sustained bursts of speed occurred with the TECs, but it's always a bit of a judgement call over whether the puncturee (and anyone else with them) can do a bit more speed, which is useful in an effort to get the ride moving again. We wouldn't leave anyone behind, so the final TEC or two would always stay with anyone else, but other TECs may move up (i) to encourage people in that group to go faster, rather than dawdling along when possibly they can go faster, and (ii) it also allows someone to move up the field and tell any waymarkers that things are happening, and they haven't been left! (and occasionally also find other people dealing with problems).One big sustained burst of speed from the TECs after repairing Andy's (?) puncture. As I said (gasped) at the time, it felt like I'd brought a knife to a gun fight as I clung onto the tail of the road bikes. I did not get dropped but the lesson is clear: oversized alu frame tubes and conti travel contacts at 80 psi may be a quick(ish) combination but it is not a comfy combination.
The journey back.. deary me... next time, am going my way, the reverse of the ride and not via these relentless poxy hills. Martin235 is a great, strong rider and so my appreciation goes for putting up with my barrage and coming back for me and waiting when my mechanical occurred. As i've got older, ahem, matured, I am appreciating the joy of cycling more rather than just a A-B route. And so I really wanted to sit back, relax and enjoy the ride home so at Rochester, I let Big M off the leash and pootled my own way home, which, for once, I did not mess up and go around in circles. I took in the sights of London and had fish n chips from a shop next Big M's house, but ate them once over Shooters Hill.. There in, it was just a gentle coast home ignoring the blinkered scalpers on their fixies and enjoying the beautiful sites on Chelsea Embankment.
I can cycle "hands off"
This is the article you need to read, on the late Sheldon Brown's website:
Derailer Adjustment
(Sheldon had a bit of a thing about how you spell that, I prefer the French spelling "dérailleur").
It's quite a long article, but quite informative, and some of the rest of the text may not be directly needed at this point, but could come in useful. It's worth reading the whole thing, then look at your bike and make sure that you can match up the bits described with your own bike (they'll be similar, but not necessarily identical), and then go back and look at the article again! You may well then need to ask the odd question in the appropriate forum on here, or another of the bike sites, but I'm sure you'll get a sympathetic response.
Dérailleurs are a bit of a black art, and some of it will end up being a case of fiddling with it, until it works, because whilst your problem seems to be primarily the front dérailleur, occasionally you may need to shift the rear one slightly as well (depending!). I think you've only got a double on the front, which should make things easier, since I always find triples a faff, but with a double the main issue is making sure that you don't overshift, which is what your gears are currently doing. With triples you need to get them to work happily in the middle as well, which invariably they won't (or not whilst working nicely at the two extremes as well!)
Davy
did you get the grease mark off the new jacket?
Ooooops! Sorry! I didnt mean to imply that whoever-it-was-on-Friday was the only person who could - it was just that I haven't seen it that close up whilst pedalling that fast for what seemed like 10 minutes or more before - so I was somewhat dumbstruck. But now I know you can - I look forward to the next FNRttC!!
This is awesome information. Thank you so much Tim. What a star!
M![]()