That's it, by all accounts, of which there are few. Suspicion of the usual tour tummy bug ripping through the team at one point, too.WTF happened to Yates this Giro ? He really has done nothing.I can only presume he came with the intention of riding himself fit into the race and it not happening.
I sort of think it would have been better to just fine them both and look like it was a strict warning.Saying that if that 10 second penalty for Roglic would have cost him his podium I'd have been gutted.Seems the jury has been called to explain its decisions on Roglic and Lopez to the UCI.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/uci...-assault-on-giro-ditalia-fan-goes-unpunished/
Seems they were just not up to date on the latest regulations for Roglic
As to the Lopez one, with my random internet fan hat on, I think it's fair enough. But I'm surprised that the jury didn't worry more about setting an inconvenient precedent. Next time Nacer loses his rag ...
From the wording of the report, doing nothing maybe wasn't an option if they found Lopez guilty: could have been fines plus penalty plus elimination or disqualification.I sort of think it would have been better to just fine them both and look like it was a strict warning.Saying that if that 10 second penalty for Roglic would have cost him his podium I'd have been gutted.
It all went swimmingly so to speak.