djondjayvadas
New Member
Hello there,
I've been getting a bit more into biking recently since I realised it wasn't beyond the realms of human accomplishment to do a 33 mile round trip to work.
I mean the first few times I nearly died but I've got the hang of it now.
I currently ride a 2008 raleigh airlite which was a bargain brand new from a friend at 150 when I bought it, but I was a bit worried by the bike radar review which said the gear ratio would be very hard for beginners on hills. And that was no lie.
My main goal at the moment is either something with better/wider gear ratio, or stepping up to three rings.
However! The path of choosing has took me through many bikes, I'm on the cycle to work scheme with NHS so I've got a budget of 50-1000 pounds - which is obviously quite a range.
I was set on a carbon bike until I read an article saying basically, I was going to save 6 seconds on a 20 minute steep hill all things being equal. So then I realised I'm not good enough for a carbon bike.
Then I thought, why don't I just get a carrera subway? But I don't think that will be -quite- fast enough.
I'm thinking at the moment of a midrange racer, something like a Giant defy 2/3, or a Scott S50.
But I'm wondering now whether even those are going to give me that greater gains over something like a subway.
My time for one way on the commute is about 1h 22 at the moment, with an average speed of 13 mph.
So in summary:
33 mile round trip
Averagely athletic
Hilly ride
Any price between 50-1000 fine, but concious that 1000 is a lot of money, so I want to see quite large gains over what a bike nearer the top end would give me compared to a lower end, given the above specs.
Help!
Thanks in advance and hello
I've been getting a bit more into biking recently since I realised it wasn't beyond the realms of human accomplishment to do a 33 mile round trip to work.
I mean the first few times I nearly died but I've got the hang of it now.
I currently ride a 2008 raleigh airlite which was a bargain brand new from a friend at 150 when I bought it, but I was a bit worried by the bike radar review which said the gear ratio would be very hard for beginners on hills. And that was no lie.
My main goal at the moment is either something with better/wider gear ratio, or stepping up to three rings.
However! The path of choosing has took me through many bikes, I'm on the cycle to work scheme with NHS so I've got a budget of 50-1000 pounds - which is obviously quite a range.
I was set on a carbon bike until I read an article saying basically, I was going to save 6 seconds on a 20 minute steep hill all things being equal. So then I realised I'm not good enough for a carbon bike.
Then I thought, why don't I just get a carrera subway? But I don't think that will be -quite- fast enough.
I'm thinking at the moment of a midrange racer, something like a Giant defy 2/3, or a Scott S50.
But I'm wondering now whether even those are going to give me that greater gains over something like a subway.
My time for one way on the commute is about 1h 22 at the moment, with an average speed of 13 mph.
So in summary:
33 mile round trip
Averagely athletic
Hilly ride
Any price between 50-1000 fine, but concious that 1000 is a lot of money, so I want to see quite large gains over what a bike nearer the top end would give me compared to a lower end, given the above specs.
Help!
Thanks in advance and hello