Grammar Pedants...

[KneesUp]

[QUOTE 3636687, member: 76"]Surely it should be 'The shed is full of bikes ridden by BMXerers'[/QUOTE]
They can't be riding them very far if they are in a full shed.

 

[subaqua]

Bad apostrophe...

Nice logic though, but then shouldn't it be BMXBs...

After all, BMX is the sport, and so it should always really be a BMXB, no?

There is another example of this but not sure I should post it

 

[Globalti]

Definitely BMXs, as in BMWs and HGVs and PSVs.

 

[Supersuperleeds]

BMXii

If there were three would it then be BMXiii?

 

[Tin Pot]

If there were three would it then be BMXiii?

Obviously not, you are referring to a BMXtrium.

 

[threebikesmcginty]

I think I saw them once, playing their experimental prog rock.

I saw them a few time's.

 

[Tin Pot]

I saw them a few time's.

FacePalm.

 

[Hitchington]

This thread is getting way too BMXey, time to leaf.

 

[nickyboy]

BMXii

So those old Ford XR3i cars were actually two XR3 cars stuck together?

 

[midlife]

Why is the bmx in capitals?

Shaun

 

[KneesUp]

Why is the bmx in capitals?

Shaun

Because that's the convention with initials. For example, NHS, SPD, TUC and so on.

 

[slowmotion]

Can we have some photo's.

 

[Crackle]

There is no plural and the collective is an attitude of bmx bikes.

 

[perplexed]

Claud's shed is full of bikes and two handbag snatchers' escape vehicles...

 

[ayceejay]

Can we have some photo's.