[/QUOTE]
In my opinion Personal Independent Payment should be means tested to an extent. Yes, we hear stories of folk getting it and if it's the higher rate, driving around in tax payer provided cars, by tax payers with far less money than the ones who get the 'free cars' and so on. And before the usual come out with the same old 'Daily Heil' and 'Daily Fail' stuff, no matter how the DM portrayed those in the article it's all true, no matter what your opinion of it is.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...o-winner-STILL-claiming-6k-year-benefits.html
I feel you need to be careful with such statements. I have a son with Downs syndrome whose only source of income is the benefits available to him. Over the past 38 years I've become familiar with our benefits system, its positives and negatives.
My impression is you spend significant amounts of money on clothing, hats, shoes and jewellery. The prices you seem willing to pay are out of reach for the majority living purely on benefits. Recently you've told the forum you're trying to decide which +/-£300 hat you should buy, ditto a +/-£400 jacket.
I'm not passing judgement merely pointing out that you appear to have a good level income, have stated you're claiming state benefits and then call for means testing.
This leaves me with the impression you have significantly greater financial resources than most people claiming benefits. Not unlike the £10m lottery winner you're calling out. I don't care how much money you have, nor the benefits you receive but do gain a certain impression of your standpoint.