Details here:
http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/T...ar-collision/story-13395986-detail/story.html
Basically, from what it seems the car driver was coming down here:
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=ivy...id=mfo0cyTUzoeHLvok0x8Q_A&cbp=12,4.03,,0,8.86
the cyclist emerged from the left and was hit by the car.
There are obviously questions about the speed of both parties, but the main point here is that the road from which the cyclist emerged had give way lines painted across it.
Apparently he was cycling with a friend:
http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/C...y-boy-Daniel/story-13388384-detail/story.html
The friend shouted, 'Daniel stop' and he didn't hear me or acknowledge me. He went straight out."
Another comment
Mr Butler said he had contacted the council and police on numerous occasions as many people drive too fast on it.
"It's a rat run, the speed the cars come down is ridiculous."
The visibility down the hill to the road looks pretty good, ultimately death could possibly have been avoided by:
(a) giving way - bikeability training?
(b) traffic calming measures - would the car have been able to stop/caused less damage at a slower speed
(c) better visiblity for the cyclist - hi-vis/lights? Did he have lights?
(d) discouraging rat-running, perhaps the driver wouldn't even havebeen there?
It does look like, as the driver was not named, that the cyclist was deemed 100% at-fault, whereas, given better awareness and road sense, he wouldn't have got into this accident. Handing out helmets as if to say 'once you've got one of these on, you'll be safe', is very irresponsible.