Time also depends on the nature of the downhills of course. I often ride in the lumpy NW - you have to brake on many of the downhills because of bends/dodgy surfaces. When riding there I do sometimes long for gently rollinh where you do get more of your climbing effort back.You don't get it back on the down hills due to wind resistance otherwise hilly rides would not take longer / be slower.
That’s hardly loadedA lighter bike feels different and puts you in a different frame of mind. When I take my (steel, but not heavyweight) bike out for a quick unladen spin it's a quite different feel/ experience to when I've put on two water bottles and a rack pack and set out for a 100 mile ride.
Nope, the opposite. I returned to cycling when I was 59 on my ancient (1979) Dawes Galaxy. At 60 I replaced it with a Condor Fratello which was ideal for my type of riding and has done around 30,000 miles. On a whim last year at 69 I bought an ex-demonstrator Condor Super Accaicio for £1800. It's supposed to be a racer but with a rear mudguard blade and a Carradice Pendle it serves well as an ultra-light tourer.Do you feel that, as you get older, it gets harder to justify spending a fair amount of money, new bike for instance, or other things that will not improve your performance due to your body not being as responsive as years gone by? I certainly do and often wish I had gone into cycling when I was much younger instead of starting at 60 and now being 69.
Makes a fair difference. One oversize bottle, plus one small bottle plus a pack containing a ridiculous quantity of tools (see other threads) sandwiches, peanuts, snack bars, lock, waterproof, spare batteries, spare GPS, phone charger, keys, other random crap that has taken up residence in my bag ... I could go on.That’s hardly loaded![]()
(You actually suggested that "weight [is one of the] two [most] important things".) I didn't say it wasn't important; I merely opined that 'weight' wasn't one of the two most important things. There's design for a start: in particular clearances, and material, as well as 'rigidity' (which I thought was going to degenerate into a @Fnaar discussion, but it didn't).Why is weight not important?
See answer above. Weight is a consideration, but it's well down the importance list (for me). And with your motorised assistance uphills, I wouldn't have though weight would be particularly important. When it matters (up hill) you have extra power to switch on.You've still not answered why not? [less weight = bike easier to ride]
I suggest the main factor in this purchase was not 'how light is it?' The Orbea Gain is 12-13kg.trying to answer the OP's question 'How does ageing affects your purchasing prospects?'
I now have to ride a eroad bike, and lower weight was a serious factor in my decision to buy an Orbea Gain.
I'd agree with this 100%. I'm 65 and regularly ride with people 20+ years younger. On my summer bike keeping the pace and taking a turn on the front is no problem. On my winter bike I'm working throughout the ride and leading and maintaining the pace is very, very tough.Not my experience, especially riding with a group, and as I said, as one ages and muscle strength inevitably drops I believe it is worth paying more for the lighter bike.
I'd agree with this 100%. I'm 65 and regularly ride with people 20+ years younger. On my summer bike keeping the pace and taking a turn on the front is no problem. On my winter bike I'm working throughout the ride and going leading and maintaining the pace is very, very tough.
The bike makes a huge difference.
I can't easily answer this as I'm not a person who retains all this knowledge. Secondly it's a bespoke bike built for club riding and touring. It's five years old.What is the spec of your winter bike?
O
I can't easily answer this as I'm not a person who retains all this knowledge. Secondly it's a bespoke bike built for club riding and touring. It's five years old.
My summer bike is a Cervelo C3 with upgraded tubeless carbon wheels. Before the wheel upgrade it performed better than my winter bike. Upgrading the wheels put at least 2mph on my average, descending is at least +4mph and significantly improved my climbing. On the climbing to the point I'm starting to challenge one of the club's best climbers - in our age range.
I can't give science to this, just what I experience every time I get on my bike. I'd never dispute the science but feel my personal, practical experience is more relevant to me as an individual.
This is a question I have started to ask myself. My children know the house will be theirs but not to expect money in the bank. In other words at 65 I've reached the stage where I value enjoyment and time more than money and I am prepared to spend it.Do you feel that, as you get older, it gets harder to justify spending a fair amount of money, new bike for instance, or other things that will not improve your performance due to your body not being as responsive as years gone by? I certainly do and often wish I had gone into cycling when I was much younger instead of starting at 60 and now being 69.
Sorry misunderstood you. It has mudguards, I use the same lights on both bikes, the tyres are Gatorskins which I've ridden for years. I only do racks, panniers etc when I'm touring and performance is not an issue.I just mean does it have mudguards, a rack, panniers, lights, touring tyres like Schwalbe Marathons, that kind of thing. There's lots of reasons why one bike might be slower than another, but weight usually has very little to do with it.