No it is just so they look more 'offroad', a decent set of forks would cost more than the bikes that have cheap ones fitted.That would be a resounding no to suspension then. Ok so if that's true why do they have it on hybrids? is it just to provide newbies with a feature they think they want but don't need?
My commute (13 miles, hilly) has some awful roads, but I still wouldn't bother with suspension. My electric bike has front suspension (RST, supposedly good quality) and I leave it on the softest setting, but I still get a jarring from the surface. My Dawes (steel frame, rigid forks) has a much comfier ride on the same roads. Seriously. Unless you are jumping over tree roots and hopping off rocks, I reckon suspension adds a lot of weight for very little benefit. If I replace the Wisper for the commute (I'm aiming for a non-assisted cycling life before too long) I wouldn't consider it. For the kind of riding I do (good roads, bad roads, trails and tracks), a decent steel frame is top of the list.Problem I have is the roads near me are terrible so less weight and more speed are not really the priority. Think suspension forks are way to go but that seems to be a whole other minefield to find ones which do the job
I do appreciate the front suspension, on my Hybrids, the one with a lockout front fork setup, is good for mixed surface rides. It's heavier and draggier than the road bikes, but does work well on a road, with the fork locked out. Having the fork 'open' is very good for stopping anyDoes anyone enjoy having a hybrid bike with front suspension?
Most of the forums I read advise against it as it's extra weight but does anyone have any positives about the benefits of having suspension on a hybrid for daily commute?