In my professional opinion...

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Fnaar

Smutmaster General
Location
Thumberland
Clarity in thought and expression are not outmoded, neither is precision.

No, I agree with you. But grammar rules that describe the way grammar worked in a different language (latin) , then applied to English 100+ years ago, do not necessarily still hold true today. :thumbsup:
 

Moon bunny

Judging your grammar
The only reason it is "wrong" to split an infinitive is because it is impossible to easily do so in Latin.
 

hoopdriver

Guru
Location
East Sussex
The only reason it is "wrong" to split an infinitive is because it is impossible to easily do so in Latin.

It is still sloppy expression. That said, there are expressions in the English language where a split infinitive is unavoidable- 'to more than double' being one that immediately pops to mind.
 

hoopdriver

Guru
Location
East Sussex
No, I agree with you. But grammar rules that describe the way grammar worked in a different language (latin) , then applied to English 100+ years ago, do not necessarily still hold true today. :thumbsup:

Why?

And was not just 100 years ago. I am nowhere near 100, being only just over halfway there, and I was most certainly taught grammar. As was everybody else in my generation and some few years afterwards. It was relevant than and it remains so, despite the justifications thrown up by sloppy educators, most of whom never caught on when it was being taught to them and later decided, of their own accord, that it was all irrelevant.
 

Fnaar

Smutmaster General
Location
Thumberland
Why?

And was not just 100 years ago. I am nowhere near 100, being only just over halfway there, and I was most certainly taught grammar. As was everybody else in my generation and some few years afterwards. It was relevant than and it remains so, despite the justifications thrown up by sloppy educators, most of whom never caught on when it was being taught to them and later decided, of their own accord, that it was all irrelevant.

I'm about the same age as you. I meant that it was in the Victorian era when educators tried to apply Latin grammar rules to English. Some of them simply don't work. I know grammar very well (I have been teaching it for nearly 30 years) and I have a healthy respect for what it is, and what it isn't. :thumbsup:
 

Haitch

Flim Flormally
Location
Netherlands
I am firmly with William Safire on the examples in that article you quote.

To me, they sound like the irresistible force of a quart of English being crammed into the immovable object of a pint pot of Latin.
 

ThinAir

Do more.
To quote a certain Mr. Twain;

"It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt".

Fewer, truer words have ever been spoken
 

colly

Re member eR
Location
Leeds
It is better to ask the question and appear ignorant for a moment, than to not ask the question and be ignorant forever.
 

djmc

Über Member
Location
Quimper
Fred's swimming is coming on well. Swimming is a gerund.
Fred swimming is a sight to be seen. Swimming is a present participle qualifying Fred. This is correct. The difference between gerunds and present participles is not entirely obvious except to those who have learned Latin. On the other hand a lot of traditional grammar was invented to describe Latin or Greek rather than English.
 

colly

Re member eR
Location
Leeds
Fred's swimming is coming on well. Swimming is a gerund.
Fred swimming is a sight to be seen. Swimming is a present participle qualifying Fred. This is correct. The difference between gerunds and present participles is not entirely obvious except to those who have learned Latin. On the other hand a lot of traditional grammar was invented to describe Latin or Greek rather than English.
Maybe, but it sounds like Greek to me.
 
Top Bottom