He can easily sue the Boris bikes for not providing a helmet. And because it was his right of way well other issues can occur. If cyclists knew first aid then there would be less dislike of them.
He can easily sue the Boris bikes for not providing a helmet. And because it was his right of way well other issues can occur. If cyclists knew first aid then there would be less dislike of them.
He can easily sue the Boris bikes for not providing a helmet. And because it was his right of way well other issues can occur. If cyclists knew first aid then there would be less dislike of them.
He can easily sue the Boris bikes for not providing a helmet.
Picking up on marafi again, I'd like to point out that many of us do know first aid, and a few of us carry first aid kits. I've used mine to help a few fellow-cyclists in recent years. There is no indication from the OP that anyone was ignorant of how to help, so your comment is insulting and pointless, along with the rest of your ridiculous and inappropriate post.
However, CoG, I am glad that you were there to help, and I am relieved that the cyclist was not more badly hurt. I hope this has a good ending.
I carry a first aid kit and did a one day first aid course about 22 years ago. I wonder if I should do another one.
He can easily sue the Boris bikes for not providing a helmet. And because it was his right of way well other issues can occur. If cyclists knew first aid then there would be less dislike of them.
How can they sue Boris Bikes, helmets are not compulsory and if they were they'd ruin the scheme, just look at the Melbourne Bike Scheme; anyway I don't think CoG even mentions a helmet![]()
Probably good to be reminded anyway. I think to be a qualified first aider officially, you need to refresh every 3(?) years?