glasgowcyclist
Charming but somewhat feckless
- Location
- Scotland
Does he have any assets with which to settle?
He doesn't need any, his (employer's) insurers will pay out.
Does he have any assets with which to settle?
Yes I understand that. The suggestion was that people feel he should pay directly. I was examining the possibility and potential consequences of that.
That's the excuse often given by convicted criminals who assets are taken. Tough.The freedom part, certainly. Does he have a family though? If so, would removing all his assets create more victims?
Rather the victim takes his assets. How do you know that everything his family needs is owned by him and they would be left with nothing?And then we pay part of it back by having to support them. Pyrrhic victory.
If they got divorced and she had bought nothing she would get half as hers. Why should this be different? Take away what is his which may be half. It may be little if she bought everything. Wife would still be left with half. Like a divorce except someone was killed.I don't know, that is why I asked.
The legal system in Scotland is a joke
It's pretty shoot in the rest of the UK too when it comes to road crime.
Is the judge now on their way to each of the victims' families' houses to piss through the letterbox?
I still dont understand why he wasnt prosecuted and even more why they werent allowed to bring a private prosecution.True - but the Scottish system is made even worse by wide discretion given to PFs and the inability to bring a private prosecution.
Well it's not like they'd be likely to commit the same/a similar offence again is it?It beggars belief that an option for dealing with someone driving when unlicensed is to ban them from driving.
Well it's not like they'd be likely to commit the same/a similar offence again is it?
Or to put it another way, just what *do* you have to do behind a wheel to get sent down?
No doctor in his right mind would pass him fit to driveWon't be still be unlicenced through medical unfitness?