Inconsistencies or plot holes in films

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
Drago

Drago

Legendary Member
The Black Hole.

Good fillum. However...

Mankind has clearly mastered anti gravity, what with the way the robots float and hover. So why not use the same gravity control technology to protect themselves from the black hole?
 
Last edited:

presta

Legendary Member
In Double Jeopardy, Ashley Judd waits until Tommy Lee Jones has recovered from a gunshot wound before going to collect her son......
 

Animo

Senior Member
Watching Terminator 2 the other night, I questioned why, when the T1000 is chasing them in the helicopter, didn't Sarah shoot the grenade launcher at it rather than ineffectively firing a gun at it. They still have the weapon because it's used again later on. Wouldn't have killed the T1000 but would have allowed them to escape at that point.

Also, why do they all go together to the Cyberdyne lab? Sarah could have just gone with Dyson and done the same job, that way keeping John out of harm's way.
 

Yellow Fang

Legendary Member
Location
Reading
This one occurred to me.

In The Martian the astronaut Mark Watney dig sup the radioactive isotope RTG generator and shoves it in the cab of his buggy thing to keep him warm. He then spends a load of time fannying about and modifying the buggy to extend its range with portable solar panels.

Now, the RTG is an electric generator, so why not just connect the bloody thing to the buggy and use that to power it and thus give it indefinite range with no need to stop to charge?

So what plot holes or inconsistencies have you spotted in the movies?

Maybe the RTG generator was AC and the buggy needed DC. There were one or two inconsistencies in the film. I wondered at the chequered solar panels. The white bits would not be generating any electricity, so why use those panels.
 
Top Bottom