Fiona N
Veteran
Well, not actually but potentially.
I never thought I complain about a cyclist's light but a few mornings ago I drove the car (rare occurrence), leaving home before dawn. On an unlit country road, I saw a very intense, flashing light and assumed I was seeing a car halogen head light through a hedge or fencing causing it to 'flash' - but it was too regular. Eventually, the cyclist got close enough that my dipped headlights illuminated him/her. I was tempted to put my lights to full beam as the rapid flashing of the single LED-type light was destroying my vision (as obviously I couldn't NOT look in it's direction as it was directly ahead of me along the road I was driving) in a way that a fixed light wouldn't have. And I wonder how much good it was doing the cyclist in terms or seeing where he was going.
The flashing was pretty rapid (ca. 5 Hz) and I can imagine it causing real problems for some drivers. I certainly think it's irresponsibly anti-driver. I've complained long and often about car drivers not dipping their lights (either at all or soon enough) when approaching a cyclist but this cycle light seems to be deliberately aimed at the drivers more like a 'weapon' that something for illuminating the road ahead and being seen by - the fixed light alone would have been just as good in the latter and better at the former purpose. I also think that it will be likely to cause a combative response from the sort of generally inconsiderate drivers (I'm thinking BWMs, big flash SUVs etc. here) who will make a point of putting their lights on fullbeam - and let's admit it - this bike light was good but it wasn't comparable to full beam on a Rangerover or a big BMW coming at you.
So do you use your bike lights like a weapon or are you just happy to be seen (and light the road ahead)?
I never thought I complain about a cyclist's light but a few mornings ago I drove the car (rare occurrence), leaving home before dawn. On an unlit country road, I saw a very intense, flashing light and assumed I was seeing a car halogen head light through a hedge or fencing causing it to 'flash' - but it was too regular. Eventually, the cyclist got close enough that my dipped headlights illuminated him/her. I was tempted to put my lights to full beam as the rapid flashing of the single LED-type light was destroying my vision (as obviously I couldn't NOT look in it's direction as it was directly ahead of me along the road I was driving) in a way that a fixed light wouldn't have. And I wonder how much good it was doing the cyclist in terms or seeing where he was going.
The flashing was pretty rapid (ca. 5 Hz) and I can imagine it causing real problems for some drivers. I certainly think it's irresponsibly anti-driver. I've complained long and often about car drivers not dipping their lights (either at all or soon enough) when approaching a cyclist but this cycle light seems to be deliberately aimed at the drivers more like a 'weapon' that something for illuminating the road ahead and being seen by - the fixed light alone would have been just as good in the latter and better at the former purpose. I also think that it will be likely to cause a combative response from the sort of generally inconsiderate drivers (I'm thinking BWMs, big flash SUVs etc. here) who will make a point of putting their lights on fullbeam - and let's admit it - this bike light was good but it wasn't comparable to full beam on a Rangerover or a big BMW coming at you.
So do you use your bike lights like a weapon or are you just happy to be seen (and light the road ahead)?
but only when they are coming towards me with full beam on
they soon get the message.