Lance Again

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
U

User169

Guest
Go on then a Film about Lance Armstrong using his name and he will not receive any money for it.

How did they manage that?

You don't necessarily need to pay someone just because you make a film about them. The film is based on David Walsh' book Seven Deadly Sins, so it's likely Walsh who will be making money via sale of the film rights. Pierre Ballester isn't too happy according to a piece in cyclingnews yesterday.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

cashy293

Active Member
You can't make an omelette without breaking eggs. So what if he was an peanut as well, what successful person isn't? If you want to get places you have to tread on a few people.

Funny when you see people slagging off a guy like Armstrong who has achieved so much, has more talent in one of his pubes than this entire forum put together. What have ya'll done that's so impressive?

Not taking into account you seem to have little knowledge of doping with comments like saying it was an even playing field as @Simpleton pointed out, its the fact you seem to think it's OK to 'tread on a few people' the way he did.

PS - Never thought I'd see the word ya'll used in this forum so for that, I applaud you! :wahhey:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4F
U

User169

Guest
You seem happy to assume lots of things on the basis of very little knowledge. 'Livestrong' is trademarked. Lance's birth name is not. As others have said, just move on.

It's not especially relevant, but Armstrong did actually obtain trademarks in the US on his birth name in relation to some goods and services, eg. bikes. Some of these marks remain in force.
 

Big Dave laaa

Biking Ninja
Location
Flintshire
You can't make an omelette without breaking eggs. So what if he was an peanut as well, what successful person isn't? If you want to get places you have to tread on a few people.

Funny when you see people slagging off a guy like Armstrong who has achieved so much, has more talent in one of his pubes than this entire forum put together. What have ya'll done that's so impressive?

Something of an armstrong fanboy I'm guessing. Do you still wear your Liestrong wristband? Ya'll come back now y'hear
 

blazed

220lb+
Something of an armstrong fanboy I'm guessing. Do you still wear your Liestrong wristband? Ya'll come back now y'hear
Absolutely. He's a legend. I grew up with him as a role model and I turned out perfect.
 

shouldbeinbed

Rollin' along
Location
Manchester way
You cannot watch or enjoy pro cycling with out the little doubt in the back of your head that whichever rider you are seeing is doping. Any one rider could easily be doping at any given time.

This is not because of Armstrong it's long been the way in cycling. The biggest names in cycling were dopers, but nobody has the hate that Armstrong does. His work outside of cycling is incredible as well. Regardless of doping, he's an extremely hard working, ambitious, determined individual and that is to be respected.

He was the best cyclist of all time. And he still cycles almost everyday and fanboys like me can give him kudos on strava.

And the Kray twins were lovely to their dear old ma and never killed a man that didn't deserve it.

Nobody is denying the depth and bredth of doping in LAs time, nor before and to a lesser degree (hopefully) after but the rest were content to skulk in the shadows and lie/deny and change the subject.

LA garners the hate he does because of the heavy handed and vindictive manner in which he went out deliberately to brutalise and defame critics and those telling the truth about him when he didn't want the truth told.

You can be a doper without being a tulip about it. LA seemed not to realise that.

I still fancy seeing the film, I'm intrigued by that side of his nature and the seeming industrialisation of team doping that he engendered that took Festina's '98 work to a whole new level. Also that the likes of Emma O'Reilly (?) and Bassons seem willing to forgive or at least understand.
 
Last edited:

blazed

220lb+
And the Kray twins were lovely to their dear old ma and never killed a man that didn't deserve it.

Nobody is denying the depth and bredth of doping in LAs time, nor before and to a lesser degree (hopefully) after but the rest were content to skulk in the shadows and lie/deny and change the subject.

LA garners the hate he does because of the heavy handed and vindictive manner in which he went out deliberately to brutalise and defame critics and those telling the truth about him when he didn't want the truth told.

You can be a doper without being a tulip about it. LA seemed not to realise that.

I still fancy seeing the film, I'm intrigued by that side of his nature and the seeming industrialisation of team doping that he engendered that took Festina's '98 work to a whole new level. Also that the likes of Emma O'Reilly (?) and Bassons seem willing to forgive or at least understand.

That's all well and good. A few people got took a hard time from Lance, boo hoo.

A positive side of him lieing is that the livestrong foundation flourished and has today raised over half a billion dollars for cancer research.

Is that not more important than a few two bobs getting hurt? Had he admitted to doping at the beginning, that money would not have been raised, how many people may have died due to not receiving that help?

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ84So65LE3GTl_sLSLFKcPlagxdkrXn-A9ab3rPNFX9qPpk0TTlw.jpg
 

shouldbeinbed

Rollin' along
Location
Manchester way
And how much more might have been raised if he hadn't dragged the Armstrong name into the gutter?

I seem to recall Livesteong doing a very good job of distancing themself from the man.

Two bobs???? As in two bob bits, rhyming slang or some colloquialism I've not heard?

Clearly disparaging & betrays a less than delightful attitude to innocent human beings telling the truth in your blinkered view.
 

AndyRM

XOXO
Location
North Shields
Livestrong was originally called The Lance Armstrong Foundation. They changed names in 2012. Can't think why.

Anyway, I've been reading some reviews of the film. Not gone down that well from what I've seen. Mid-October for a UK release.
 
Top Bottom