That made me laugh out loud.
Dunno about that. Armstrong as an athlete was superb. Measured VO2 is one of the highest ever recorded. And having read Emma O'Reilys book she talks about Armstrongs amazing ability to recover, without the need to dope.
Yeah but he was certainly prepared.Dunno about that. Armstrong as an athlete was superb. Measured VO2 is one of the highest ever recorded. And having read Emma O'Reilys book she talks about Armstrongs amazing ability to recover, without the need to dope.
Actually this was all part of the web of lies that were spun to mask his doping. The real data shows that his VO2 max was nowhere near what was claimed and his heart isn't particularly massive. It was his ego that was exceptional and the chip on his shoulder
but he won the Worlds pre doping.
That wouldn't cover every use of your name. You can't stop people writing books or making films about you neither can you demand a share of the profits.
Well you know they'd be effective, the issue would be forcing your family to take them to assist youThat's why I said it wasn't especially relevant. Lance did also file a trademark application for his name in connection with the provision of oncology pharmaceuticals. Imagine taking Lance Armstrong branded medicines!
The usual thing trotted out is the study Ed Coyle made of him (although, obviously don't know whether that's what you're referring to).Really? I'd have thought the VO2 test was done early on in his carear pre doping.