Here's EF Education Oatly's statement
Instagram Link.
I think the key here is the bit I've put in bold. The system in question is operated by Velon. There is a bigger political battle behind this.
We are shocked and disappointed by the UCI's decision to disqualify several teams, including ours, from the Tour de Romandie Féminin.
Earlier this week, all affected teams sent formal letters to the UCI expressing support for rider safety but raising serious concerns about the unilateral imposition of a GPS tracking device to just one of the riders per team.
We made clear that:
- We would not select a rider ourselves, nor install, remove, or maintain the device.
- The UCI or its partner was free to select a rider and install the device at their own liability if they believe they are in their right to do so.
Despite our cooperation and the existence of a proven and collaborative safety tracking system already tested successfully in other major races (fully operational for the whole peloton and offered to the UCI), the UCI has chosen to impose this measure without clear consent, threaten disqualification, and now exclude us from the race for not selecting a rider ourselves. The reason why they don't want to nominate a rider themselves is still unknown and unanswered. Despite multiple requests by the teams over the last two days, the UCI commissaires were unable to demonstrate on the basis of which precise UCI rule teams are obligated to discriminate one rider against other riders in terms of obligations (except for officially refering to an email of the teams's union) but have nevertheless decided to carry on and disqualify the teams with their riders.
This action disregards the rights of teams and riders, applies the measure in a discriminatory manner, and contradicts the UCI's own stated commitment to dialogue with stakeholders.
We are always at the forefront to make cycling a safer sport, but it should be achieved through collaboration, not coercion.
