Yes, I thought their conduct was equally reprehensible.
Yes, I thought their conduct was equally reprehensible.
They both committed public order offences, so equally reprehensible,
It's interesting that virtually the only place I get abuse is on a stretch with cycle lanes marked (not common in our neck of the woods - and completely unnecessary as this is on a stretch of wide wide road). The local council has just 'improved' the cycling infrastructure in a number of areas, redirecting cyclists onto new shared use paths, and constructing 'cyclist dismount' crossings. The abuse will no doubt now increase, as I won't be using the 'improvements', so thoughtfully (?) provided, no doubt much to the annoyance of some local council-tax paying drivers.
I've raised this exact point with Devon County Council - the only places I regularly get abusive motorists is where a 'shared cycle path' (pavement with a bike painted on) runs by the side of the road. All it needs two or three signs saying "Cyclists may use the road" alongside, as so many drivers genuinely think we're obliged to use these half-baked paths. DCC weren't interested, sadly, despite their enthusiasm for cycling, citing both budgetary pressures, and saying that such signs wouldn't be allowed as a permitted type of sign. Grrr.We've got that in Norwich, they're putting a cycle lane in Tombland and the Norwich Cycling Campaign raised the issue of thicko drivers who think cycle lanes are mandatory. Like this idiot.