Lights, how much is a life worth?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

GrumpyGregry

Here for rides.
Photo or it didn't happen.
Will this do?
bumpscar.jpg
 
OP
OP
Broughtonblue
Location
Norfolk
So quite a few interesting responses to this thread, the main argument amongst the neigh Sayers seems to be that you shouldn't need a light to be seen, the others should be able to spot you.
I wonder if these people, if they were ever unfortunate enough to be in a plane crash, when putting on the inflatable lifejacket would rip off the attached light saying no need for this, I disregard any responsibility on my part to be seen and place that responsibility onto someone else to spot me?
 

Mugshot

Cracking a solo.
Whilst riding home the other night I chanced upon a horse and rider coming towards me along one of the lanes, another driver had been thoughtful enough to let me know before I got to them, (I had waited for them in a passing place and they stopped alongside me, I wonder if they let other road users know about cyclists too?) anyway, neither the horse nor the rider had any lights on at all what they did have however was a car driving along behind them with the hazard lights going, seemed like a good idea.
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
So quite a few interesting responses to this thread, the main argument amongst the neigh Sayers seems to be that you shouldn't need a light to be seen, the others should be able to spot you.
I thought the main argument was: yes, it's wrong, but why does it matter to you so much more than the factors which contribute to more collisions? ;-)
 

Dan B

Disengaged member
So quite a few interesting responses to this thread, the main argument amongst the neigh Sayers seems to be that you shouldn't need a light to be seen, the others should be able to spot you.
I wonder if these people, if they were ever unfortunate enough to be in a plane crash, when putting on the inflatable lifejacket would rip off the attached light saying no need for this, I disregard any responsibility on my part to be seen and place that responsibility onto someone else to spot me?
I wonder if comparing a road to an ocean loses a salient distinction between an intrinsically hazardous natural environment and a public space regulated by civility and law, and whether a swimming pool would not be the better analogy? I don't go to any special lengths to make myself highly visible when swimming in the public baths.

But we could go round and round on this topic forever, which is eventually going to leave even the neigh sayers sounding a little horse
 
Last edited:

LinchPin

Veteran
Location
Recovery tent.
I thought the main argument was: yes, it's wrong, but why does it matter to you so much more than the factors which contribute to more collisions? ;-)
The best I can do is http://www.rospa.com/roadsafety/adviceandinformation/cycling/facts-figures.aspx
'Failed to look properly' was attributed to the car driver in 57% of serious collisions and to the cyclist in 43% of serious collisions at junctions.

Common Cycling Accidents
    • Motorist emerging into path of cyclist
    • Motorist turning across path of cyclist
    • Cyclist riding into the path of a motor vehicle, often riding off a pavement
    • Cyclist and motorist going straight ahead
    • Cyclist turning right from a major road and from a minor road
    • Child cyclist playing or riding too fast
No mention of lights at all...
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
That bullet list looks like it isn't in what I remember as the order from the TRL study but hey, it's TRL so check it carefully. :laugh: The TRL website is giving me an error instead of PPR 445 anyway. RoSPA's "often riding off a pavement" is weasel wording, whereas I think "motorist disobeyed stop signal or give way" is in the TfL top 5 for 2011-2013 but it's missing from RoSPA's list.

Either way, "no lights" doesn't show up on anyone's list of top causes.
 

sheffgirl

Senior Member
Location
Sheffield
Well technically it was neither becauseit was ddaylight :biggrin:
 

SpokeyDokey

67, & my GP says I will officially be old at 70!
Moderator
Umm, I think it's slightly silly for anyone to make themselves vulnerable but therein lies a completely different question really. My route is reasonably well lit, so I think I could probably get away with no lights and be perfectly safe, even in the darkest parts. I choose to use lights, but that's more so I can be seen while I skim through slow moving or stopped traffic, in case people get the sudden inclination to swerve in on me. That said, if I were more cautious and took things slowly then I really can't see a safety issue at all and I'd add that if people have trouble seeing me then they really should pop down to the optician.

As for the value of life, well that's a deep, personal question and I haven't the time to interview everyone, so I really couldn't answer it, but I imagine that some people really couldn't give a sh1t, no, and some might even be praying to get hit.

On another note though, I was riding home this fine evening and I found myself following another cyclist. I can confirm that until I got very close to them, I couldn't see that they were wearing high-viz so I'm very happy that I never spent a penny on that poop :biggrin:

Specsavers have some good deals at the moment.
 
Top Bottom