G3CWI
Veteran
- Location
- Macclesfield
Harder to see some things sometimes at night?
...not the moon and stars.
Harder to see some things sometimes at night?
So if I may paraphrase: although in the absence of other road users it would be safe to ride an unlit bicycle, the excess of light from other road users makes it unsafe not to add to that excess by getting some lights of your own. The only way to make it safe for yourself is to contribute to making it less safe for everyone?On a clear road with no cars coming towards you with glaring headlights you'll have better vision to see the heroic ninja but when it's raining and the other side of the road is just a wall of light from passing cars then probably not as much.
The bit I've emboldened is a far more dangerous action than having no lights. IIRC, entering the road without priority is one of the top mainly-cyclist-caused factors in urban collisions (but still not quite as frequent as most variations on motorists failing to give way).riding a mountain bike with no lights, suddenly off the pavement
So if I may paraphrase: although in the absence of other road users it would be safe to ride an unlit bicycle, the excess of light from other road users makes it unsafe not to add to that excess by getting some lights of your own. The only way to make it safe for yourself is to contribute to making it less safe for everyone?
I'm part of the problem myself (I'm a parent, and therefore a coward), but I'm assuredly not going to start complaining about people who refuse to be part of that arms race. Especially given that cyclists have to carry or generate their own power source wherease motorists have mechanically propelled vehicles to carry theirs around in, it doesn't seem like a race where anyone using a human-powered vehicle is going to come out ahead.
I thought cars have headlights to help drivers combat the variability of street lighting. Usually two of them, but lots around here can't be arsed to go to Halfords for a new bulb so get by with the one.I have an eight minute walk home from the station and in that time the road lighting changes dramatically due to trees obscuring lights etc. I see people walking appear and disappear as the light changes which would happen with unlit cyclists as well.
I don't see how. Better lights make it safer for me at the expense of everyone else, I'm pretty sure the same is not true of drink drivingPerhaps the lighting issue is the same as drink/driving and wearing seat belts.
I wondered about the distance of one's typical dipped headlight vs the stopping distance. Whereas I'm thinking of the guy with a light on that can be seen hundreds of metres away up in the distance, forewarned etc.I thought cars have headlights to help drivers combat the variability of street lighting. Usually two of them, but lots around here can't be arsed to go to Halfords for a new bulb so get by with the one.
And of course, if the drivers are driving faster than they can stop within the distance they can see...
...that would somehow be a cyclist's fault.
Obviously.
Surely there's a happy medium between no lights and lights that blind all within 200m.?I don't see how. Better lights make it safer for me at the expense of everyone else, I'm pretty sure the same is not true of drink driving
Ah the forewarned delusion. First cousin of the illusion of attention.I wondered about the distance of one's typical dipped headlight vs the stopping distance. Whereas I'm thinking of the guy with a light on that can be seen hundreds of metres away up in the distance, forewarned etc.
People do drive faster than they can stop in and they always will until Google cars take to the road.
I wouldn't say it was the cyclists fault but I can't believe having no lights wouldn't be a contributing factor in certain circumstances like a normal run of the mill road with Johnny Average driver.
Having decent lights might just be an expensive rabbit foot talisman but my life experience has shown me that I see things with lights easier than shadows on shadows.
If the purpose of lights is to stand out against the background, and the background consists of other people/cars/objects with lights on, it can only end one waySurely there's a happy medium between no lights and lights that blind all within 200m.?
The police were actually stopping mislit vehicles on my way home tonight, directing them into a layby and giving them tickets (I think whatever the current equivalent of the old stripe-edge tickets requiring you to prove you fixed it within two weeks). Long may it continue!I thought cars have headlights to help drivers combat the variability of street lighting. Usually two of them, but lots around here can't be arsed to go to Halfords for a new bulb so get by with the one.