Well, I do think weight is what the original post was all about. Here is an older guy like me who finds it hard to get up the hills, and who rightly concludes that the combined weight of himself and his luggage is responsible, together with age/lack of fitness. Climbing is all about beating gravity, and that is elementary physics: reduce the weight. His idea was that his tent could be lighter, and that may be so. However, I think that if he is carrying 35 kg, there may be other options, the more so since he likes his tent for its height. Striking the balance between the comfort provided by carrying weight and the comfort of not carrying weight is a personal thing, of course. However, 35 kg is a lot, and there may be very good ways to reduce it without losing much comfort. Alternatively, the same comfort may weigh less if you spend money on modern gear. The methodology is that you try to decide where losing weight means the least loss of comfort, and where you may spend your money best to loose weight but not (or not much) comfort. From my experience there are plenty of opportunities if you start at 35 kg.
So what is that experience, and why do I give these examples? I have now camped for about half a century, from my childhood when we drove all over Europe, camping in a bungalow tent (and a litle tent for me and my kid brother), through backpacking with old fashioned lightweight gear (13-16 kg) in my school and student days, to cycle camping from my mid twenties until now. I started buying modern gear when our first child was born, fifteen years ago, and we wanted to continue cycle camping. Money was tight, but we needed some new stuff because of the kids, and it had to be lightweight because otherwise the two of us could never carry all that luggage and the two kids on two bikes. Each time we needed something new we bought something light (like our 5kg Hilleberg Keron 4gt family tent), making do with the older stuff that was still in working condition, because the budget did not go any further. In recent years, we finally replaced all the decades old heavy gear because it was finally completely worn, because the budget was now there, and because we had learned enough about the modern gear to know what we needed. A memorable trip was a few years ago when we crossed Switzerland with the kids, cycling from Basle to Como. That was tough, because even after much investment in lighter gear my wife and I were still carrying most of the weight, of course. In recent years I have also begun to do more adventurous solo trips with friends, such as last summer with the Dutch cycle touring club to Norway. For some pictures of that, see
http://picasaweb.goo...orwegen/Anneke# My loaded bike is the bike on the left in picture 6. On that trip I was carrying 18 kg, because I had taken the gear to cope with potentially rather cold (i.e minus 10 at altitude) and wet weather. Leave that home, and I am down to 15 kg.
Without the rather serious weight reductions of the last few years, I could not do such trips anymore. I don't know about others, but I think climbing ability is the thing you loose most when you grow older. So that is where I compensate by using my experience of what I need and what not, and by replacing for example a bulky and heavy old sleeping bag with a cotton outer with expensive light stuff like the PHD bags that I can now afford. Going light allows me to go and to continue to go to places where I could not go otherwise.
I really do not want to impose my views and experiences on anyone. However, when, like here, I read about an older guy like myself (at 57) who struggles to lug his 35 kg up a hill, I sympathise (been there, done that too), and I think I have a relevant story. Particularly if he himself realizes that weight is his problem. The cycle touring world is only just beginning to recognize the possibilities that have been discovered by the ultralight movement in backpacking, where a luggage weight of 5-10 kg is now almost the norm. You will not see me go down that low, but I do think we can take a leaf from their book.
Finally, comfort. I do not know what others find comfortable, and comparing notes when you are travelling with others can be fascinating. For me it is not about replicating home. It is about not lacking the basics of a good night's rest (I have an Exped Downmat but would buy a cheaper and lighter Synmat Basic now), warmth in cold weather, protection against the elements, safety (I will always take an emergency blanket etc), and a good meal of freshly cooked ingredients. I make real coffee every morning, I will not drink my wine from a coffee mug, and you will not see me in a cramped tent like a Terra Nova Laser. For me a Ringstind 2 or a Hubba Hubba HP for two represent about the minimum for comfortable solo camping. In the evenings you will not see me dressed in cycling lycra. And yet, all this adds up to only 15+ kg.
As for a tent for tall people: how tall are you sitting up on your chair? The vast majority of small 2 person tents are in the 90-100 cm inner height range, and even that often only at one point. The Ringstind is the tallest that I know at 110 cm, and I have seen the 2 person model and I think it is pretty spacious for one person. The Hubba Hubba HP (get the HP version for camping in the UK or you will be cold) is the most spacious sub 2 kg 2 person tent that I know. It is a bit lower, but over a larger area. For anything taller, you are looking at mostly 3 person tents, so they will be heavier and more expensive for the same quality. So you really need to find out first what your precise requirements are.
Willem
p.s. there is of course the Tarptents Scarp 2:
http://www.tarptent.com/products.html It is a bit fragile, however, and in windy UK conditions I would not use it without the extra cross poles.