mjr
Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
- Location
- mostly Norfolk, sometimes Somerset
I think few are trying to prove their views are the only ones worth considering. I think more are trying to prove that certain other views are flawed, which is not quite the same. After all, this seems to be doing similar:The people he's asked for help in answering these questions, trying to prove their views are the only ones worth considering aren't answering or helping.
Because it's one of those simple, obvious and wrong answers. Doing whatever superstitious nonsense people demand (even if they're family - and I've had this sort of discussion with some of my own family, of course) won't help anyone in the long term. Once a rider complies with one baseless "common sense" demand, there may well be pressure to comply with another... possibly continuing forever. How many hoops should someone have to jump through before getting on a bike, before you'd say it was too much? And if some of us are right and so-called hi-vis is more often dazzle camo and it puts the rider at more risk, shouldn't we try to dissuade all involved before they get hurt?We all react differently to such incidents, and there is a knock on effect to family that may not cycle. Reassuring them may be the hardest part of this. However if in trying to help them, family, in this involves the simple step of making themselves more visible in their partners eyes, why is it dismissed out of hand?
Let's take another widespread-safety-myth analogy: if a relative wanted you to install electrical socket covers before they visit with their young child, would you comply for a quiet life or try to explain that they're unnecessary with UK socket designs and actually more dangerous than nothing? And if you complied, how would you feel if the child then uses a bent cover to expose a live pin and shock herself?
And as @Dogtrousers may suspect, I don't try to cite a load of stats and I'm less abrupt with my family than on this forum. As @MontyVeda alluded to, worry isn't always logical, so the arguments need to be more emotional, even if they're underpinned by evidence, but what works for you probably isn't what worked for me so I leave other people to choose arguments that seem natural to them.