I'm not so sure, it rolled along ok for me and left enough room for the story to breathe & with a few loose threads to tie up without being contrived and crushed into an hour.I thought part two last night was a bit of a disappointment - much too explicit about the nature of the creepy thing, and some very strange silent sequences of rooms (e.g. the attic in Tom's old house) when none of the characters was in the house and it wasn't clear what the point of view was supposed to be. Maybe this should have been a one-hour piece, not stretched over three parts?