rh100 said:One car that needs to be remade - the Ford Capri (it would have to have a vinyl roof though)
The other favourite they have already done, the VW Scirocco, the old one's were lovely
Arch said:<bangs head on desk>
That Cit is just a modern Cit, only with a curvy bonnet... Ugh. I bet it weighs a tonne, and I bet you won't be able to take the back seat out as an impromptu sofa..
BrumJim said:Sorry - even worse news. My link to the new 2CV is a couple of years old.
The latest style looks like this:
Citroen already produced a perfect 2CV successor...
... but they axed it recently. I'm talking about the original shape Berlingo Multispace.
n common with the Tin Snail it was practical, comfortable without being luxurious; definitive early versions had a simple fabric retractable roof, economical, spanned social classes and paid scant regard to styling, ie it was 'non-styled' like the original. It was that a shape because it needed to be, not because market forces dictated. Sadly in replacing the Berlingo they made the successor too large. The new Nemo is too small. Both are poor value if you add essential safety kit. Berlingos also had decent depreciation; the only Citroen until recently to be able to claim this since the 2CV.
The "DS2" is not a 2CV. It has three doors and is contrived to look a bit like a 2CV. It will not be simple in execution nor as long-lived and repairable. Nor of course is it a DS. Nor is the DS3... But therein lies another rant.
Rhythm Thief said:This comment is bang on:
The whole point of the 2CV was not that its headlights were on stalks, or that its rear wheels were half covered up, or that it was "cute", or anything like that. The point was that it was an extremely practical carwhich used (for its day) very little fuel and was easy to service (I built one once, out of two knackered ones) and cheap to buy and run. As the chap says, a 2CV replacement doesn't have to take its styling cues from the original, it just has to be as practical as the original. It's symptomatic of a society which values style over substance.
Rhythm Thief said:It's symptomatic of a society which values style over substance.
User3094 said:OK, so who's going to tell Linford that a 2CV is a proper off roader?![]()
Rhythm Thief said:The whole point of the 2CV was not that its headlights were on stalks, or that its rear wheels were half covered up, or that it was "cute", or anything like that. The point was that it was an extremely practical carwhich used (for its day) very little fuel and was easy to service (I built one once, out of two knackered ones) and cheap to buy and run. As the chap says, a 2CV replacement doesn't have to take its styling cues from the original, it just has to be as practical as the original. It's symptomatic of a society which values style over substance.
Rhythm Thief said:It's symptomatic of a society which values style over substance.
I had a friend who drove a Metro. It was badged a Rover 100 Kensington, and that's how he referred to it. At every opportunity I would refer to it as a Metro, and watch his veins bulge.
upsidedown said:No it's symptomatic of a society that wishes to get to a destination, rather than standing at the side of the road waiting for a recovery truck.
Arch said:There's no reason why an old, simple vehicle like the 2CV shouldn't be as reliable as a new car, if looked after. Indeed, with a 2CV you have much more chance of being able to fix it yourself, than with something that needs a computer to diagnose it, and a new set of chips to fix.
upsidedown said:BMW Mini...
upsidedown said:No it's symptomatic of a society that wishes to get to a destination, rather than standing at the side of the road waiting for a recovery truck.