Mostly familiar stuff in this Times rant

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Treat bicycles as strictly as cars to make roads safe

Nick Freeman

methode%2Ftimes%2Fprod%2Fweb%2Fbin%2F8dbe2e80-aeee-11e8-8fb1-ac438dd6af00.jpg

Share
Save
There is a territorial tussle taking place on Britain’s roads as drivers and cyclists vie for space on our crowded highways. Each maintains they have the greater right.

Drivers often see the biker as an irritant, while those using pedal power often claim the moral high ground (it is a healthier and more environmental way to travel). Both have an equal right to the road, but it is time that equality extended to the legislation that covers traffic laws.

At the moment cyclists can commit road traffic offences with impunity. And since bikers often wear helmets and shaded cycling glasses, they are difficult to identify and can weave quickly away through traffic. So how are they supposed to be apprehended? Only this week a pedestrian in east London was hospitalised after being hit by a cyclist who made off from the scene.

What’s needed is a system where, like motorists, cyclists are subject to a points system and pay fines, or more, where appropriate. This could be done by introducing mandatory identification for cyclists — for example with the compulsory wearing of numbered tabards registered to the cyclist (and not the bike). Cyclists should also have to pay some form of insurance.

The government may argue it is already acting. The Department for Transport recently launched a 12-week consultation looking at whether new offences of “death by dangerous cycling” or “death by careless cycling”, should be introduced. The move followed the case of Charlie Alliston, who was jailed for 18 months for “wanton and furious driving”, after he collided with and killed a pedestrian, Kim Briggs, while riding a bicycle with no front brakes.

Sadly, this is an empty, headline-grabbing move. For although every death is a tragedy, the number of cases involving collisions between cyclists and pedestrians is tiny. Of the 448 pedestrians killed on Britain’s roads in 2016, only three cases involved bicycles — the rest were caused by cars or lorries.

In contrast, there are countless occasions of cyclists jumping red lights, riding on the pavement and using their bikes without due care. As someone who drives up to 50,000 miles a year, I see this all the time.

Cyclists and motorists need to be able to share the road and should face similar punishments for breaking the law. It is the only way to make our roads safer.

Nick Freeman is a road traffic and criminal defence lawyer
 
OP
OP
Apollonius

Apollonius

Guru
Where do we queue for the "numbered tabards"? I really can't wait. I want one that fits a 4 year-old as well as my XXL frame.....
 
OP
OP
Apollonius

Apollonius

Guru
For a successful lawyer, he is alarmingly vague in some of his unsubstantiated assertions: "using their bikes without due care" for example. Without due care for what? With what harmful consequences?
 

Drago

Legendary Member
A nice free advert for a celebrity lawyer who, dispute his reputation, has a success rate little different to others in the field. He even managed to squeeze in the old cliche about knowing more than anyone else on the subject because he drives 50,000 miles a year.

3/10.
 

marzjennings

Legendary Member
Is the same Mr Loophole ( his name for himself on twitter) who thinks women should tone down their attire to help avoid perverts? Oh yes I believe it is. Also the same nobber with a track record for getting dangerous drivers off the hook.
 

Mrklaw

Active Member
or perhaps we prosecute for leaving the scene of an accident like we would anyone? They make it sound like cyclists can get away with things because they have small vehicles so can nip off. Ignoring that in the case of an accident the cyclist is likely to be injured too, or that a similar accusation could be aimed at motorcyclists.
 
Top Bottom