biggs682
Touch it up and ride it
- Location
- Northamptonshire
42 miles under my belt on damp underfoot in places roads.
First cuppa brewing
Washing machine using the solar panel power
First cuppa brewing
Washing machine using the solar panel power
Today's 73 plate truck has 118461 kilometres on the odometer and has taken me to Hadleigh.
Today's weight is... 🏋️
View attachment 729555
The short answer is yes it's partly why the court of appeal has over turned convictions.One thing I have not heard mention of in the POL Inquiry is "exculpatory evidence". When they decided to withold evidence of systemic/system-wide bugs, surely they were breaking the law.
From a on-line legal dictionary, I read:
"When a prosecutor has access to any type of exculpatory evidence, he is required by law to disclose the evidence to the defense. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence may result in a dismissal of the case, or in the declaration of a mistrial".
You can in British law it's untimely down to the judge if it meets the test for none disclosure of evidence.there are legal reasons to withhold it. I think if withholding it prevents another crime
Crikey, that looks nice.
I'm feeling short-changed with my poxy croissant
They always seem to overcook the mushrooms IME.