Today's 73 plate truck has 118461 kilometres on the odometer and has taken me to Hadleigh.
Today's weight is... 🏋️
View attachment 729555
The short answer is yes it's partly why the court of appeal has over turned convictions.One thing I have not heard mention of in the POL Inquiry is "exculpatory evidence". When they decided to withold evidence of systemic/system-wide bugs, surely they were breaking the law.
From a on-line legal dictionary, I read:
"When a prosecutor has access to any type of exculpatory evidence, he is required by law to disclose the evidence to the defense. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence may result in a dismissal of the case, or in the declaration of a mistrial".
You can in British law it's untimely down to the judge if it meets the test for none disclosure of evidence.there are legal reasons to withhold it. I think if withholding it prevents another crime
Crikey, that looks nice.
I'm feeling short-changed with my poxy croissant
They always seem to overcook the mushrooms IME.