(To the OP) I've read it. As above, why not provide us with a précis of the post and then develop the debate on here from that? People interested in the theory and wider context can always read your blog post for that if necessary, but the nature of a forum is that generally something succinct is needed as a starting point.
In the case of this (blog) post, the subject of symbolic violence seems to me well worth discussion here and that debate is likely to be more dynamic than it would be if conducted as comments directly on your blog. For example, I'd be interested in thoughts on whether it's possible to escape a loop whereby symbolic violence tends to lead to its subject feeling the need to comply and thus becoming complicit with the system engendering it and thereby prolongs and strengthens that system. Complicity spreads 'blame' (in general), so the responsibility for ending the symbolic violence - assuming that that's desirable - presumably rests with all parties involved? (But I'm not about to summarise your blog for you in order to provide the context for that example as that's presumptuous and I'm too lazy - it's your job as the OP, surely!)
.
