My video has been rejected from Youtube? Why?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

BentMikey

Rider of Seolferwulf
Location
South London
WOW!!! You cite Mythbusters as credible research - it is an entertainment programme, you might as well put Del Boy as a replacement for Lord Sugar in The Apprentice.
Years ago it was 'proved' that decaff coffee was better than ordinary coffee and a lot of people switched over and was later 'proved' that it was worse for you.
Stats and research can 'prove' almost anything - if you put ypur head in a freezer and your feet in an oven at gas mark 5, overall you will be at a comfortable temperature\
Ban mobile phones because they are a distraction but what about other distractions like passengers, children, GPS, CDs & radio?.Are you banning them too along with MP3 players and ear phones for cyclists?
Drinking and driving? I am in favour of zero tolerence. Ant alcohol in the bloodstream means an automatic lifetime ban - no mitigating circumstances

Well, you're right, it is entertainment, but it's also well done and fairly rigorous on the science. The conclusions are backed up by several peer reviewed studies. Phone driving is as or more dangerous than drink driving, and it's not the same as the other distractions you've listed, not even slightly.

I thought you might like to see the easy to watch and digest version, and enjoy it, rather than digging through dry studies.
 

400bhp

Guru
Sigh, back on ignore.
 

dawesome

Senior Member
I personally wouldn't do this, but an acquaintance stands in front of drivers chatting on a mobile and shouts "Are you stupid!?" until a crowd gathers. Peer pressure, public shaming, whaddever you call it.
 

subaqua

What’s the point
Location
Leytonstone
I personally wouldn't do this, but an acquaintance stands in front of drivers chatting on a mobile and shouts "Are you stupid!?" until a crowd gathers. Peer pressure, public shaming, whaddever you call it.

i don't think i have met you or do you know somebody else who does this. last time i did this was last night on way home as i was going round Cathall RAB , by the leisure centre. goldline cars taxi driver
 

dawesome

Senior Member
i don't think i have met you or do you know somebody else who does this. last time i did this was last night on way home as i was going round Cathall RAB , by the leisure centre. goldline cars taxi driver


I was nearly squished on that roundabout by a driver so frustrated by a two-car jam that he came round the roundabout the wrong way.
 

mr_hippo

Living Legend & Old Fart
Not a valid comparison. Think about it, the distracting part of having a conversation on a mobile isn't merely the act of holding the phone. In face-to-face communication us humans rely on a great deal of non-verbal clues- body language, facial expression, gestures etc. With a conversation on a phone these clues are stripped away so the listener has to concentrate harder to ascertain what they are listening to. Not anywhere near as distracting as listening to the radio. The studies show that using a mobile whilst driving impairs ability the same as being drunk:
Give a man enough rope and he will hang himself and you have! "In face-to-face communication us humans rely on a great deal of non-verbal clues- body language, facial expression, gestures etc." How do you get all these clues? By looking at your passenger and if you are looking at your passenger, you are not looking at the road.
 

dawesome

Senior Member
Mobile phone calls, including calls made on hands-free devices, are more distracting to drivers than chatting passengers, according to a study released Monday by University of Utah researchers.
The study, which analyzed the driving performance of 41 adults and their 41 passenger friends, was the latest in a University of Utah series of cell phone use by drivers and was directed by Frank Drews, a Ph.D. researcher at the university.

The researchers set up three separate scenarios: one for conversations with hands-free cell phones, another with in-car conversations between drivers and passengers, and a final scenario with no conversation. A simulator presenting a 24-mile multilane highway complete with on- and off-ramps, overpasses, and two-lane traffic was utilized in the research.
Real highway conditions were mimicked and drivers were told to observe surrounding traffic in each of the three scenarios.
"All drivers were instructed to leave the simulated highway once they arrived at a rest area about eight miles from the starting point," the report said. "The driving sequences took about 10 minutes to finish."
Drivers talking on cell phones tended to drift in their lanes, kept greater distance between their cars and the cars they were following, and were four times more likely to miss pulling off the highway at a prearranged location. Passenger conversations had little effect on the drivers.
So, why did drivers with talkative passengers appear to be safer?
One reason suggested by the researchers was that chatting passengers may actually support drivers by talking about surrounding traffic in a way that helps driver awareness.

http://www.informationweek.com/news/212201254

You're trying, not awfully well, to defend driving whilst using a mobile.
 

4F

Active member of Helmets Are Sh*t Lobby
Location
Suffolk.
Drivers talking on cell phones kept greater distance between their cars and the cars they were following :popcorn:
 

dawesome

Senior Member
Where in any of my posts am I defending mobile use?

The ones where you demanded evidence that driving on a mobile was more dangerous than drink driving, the way you ignored the evidence published that demonstrated you're wrong, the way you claimed statistics can be manipulated, the rather strange reference to sticking your head in an oven, the way you claimed chatting to passengers is the same thing.
 

Bigsharn

Veteran
Location
Leeds
Use Vimeo, upload a video to Youtube explaining that the video is hosted there and provide a link. Seeing as it doesn't break any of Vimeo's T&Cs and it's not HOSTED on Youtube you shouldn't have a problem
 
OP
OP
Matthew_T

Matthew_T

"Young and Ex-whippet"
For something as minor as just one video of someone on a mobile phone (I regularly see them on the roads) then I dont think I will re-upload it.

The point that I was trying to make is not about mobile phone use, but that YouTube took it down probably because of a complaint from the company.
 

MrJamie

Oaf on a Bike
The point that I was trying to make is not about mobile phone use, but that YouTube took it down probably because of a complaint from the company.
I dont like that they can get stuff taken down so easily when its just footage in a public area.

Do youtube get annoyed with people upping an already removed video, or just keep removing them? Im thinking more if this had been something more serious they were trying to sweep under the carpet.
 
Top Bottom