Before making your decision, you need to be frank with yourself about what sort of riding you intend to do. At a 60/40 split you need to think a bout the weight of the bike.
Halfords and others all use the term "lightweight" and the bikes with suspension you link to are all about 14 kg. that is NOT light I'm afraid. I have a full suss bike that weighs 13.5 kg, and I can promise you that is a hefty thing to throw around, let alone ride any distance for fun. (It serves a pretty specific purpose though!)
On those MX bikes the bulk of the weight comes from the suspension fork. ( the DS in the fork blurb means disc specific by the way, otherwise the fork isthe same) . If you intend to ride on rutted and bumpy tracks or bridle ways, then yes, a bit of suspension will help, but the weight penalty may well outweigh the benefits of a fatter tyre and better line choice. S, my argument would be, if you intend to ride on green ways and canal towpaths, suspension is not worth the extra heft. If you want to ride on proper off road routes with rocks, steps and drops, then 63 mm of poorly damped suntour fork travel is not going to help much anyway, and yu need to consider better suspension.
I suspect you mean canal towpaths and greenways, forest fire roads and the like, in which case I would steer you towards the rigid forked sport hybrids. The Hybrid comp has 28 mm road biased tyres, which are designed to run at high pressures, and ridden fast on urban streets, so will suffer on a towpath a bit. you may be able to upmthe tyre size to 32 to give a fatter, softer ride. However, in your list you include the Hybrid Sport. This lists 32mm randonneur tyres, ideal for gentle off roading. It also has good quality rim brakes, a good sit up and beg riding position, and will be quick on the road. The clincher for me is that it weighs 11.4 kg, and given that the list of components is good solid Shimano and FSA, that ain't bad at all in today's market.