Afraid I can only read the headline as I'm not a subscriber so I don't appreciate details of the report.
Headline refers to stopping at zebra whereas summary line below refers to a "floating bus stop". Did they count the number of cars failing to stop?
Not sure you understand what a "floating bus stop" is.
You have the regular footway b(pavement), with a bus shelter on it, you have a cycle lane, you have a bus lane, and you have the regfular carriageway.
At the bus stop, you have a zebra across the cycle lane, for the bus passengers to move between the bus and the pavement.
This is a typical one in Cardiff which I use every time I commute in by bike.
But in any broad group of people (like cyclists) you are always going to get a wide range some of whom will be less considerate than others. What gets worrying is what agenda the reporter has focusing on cyclists rather than eg poor dangerous drivers ...
Edit: ... 'cos when I go into town/city as a pedestrian it's cars and vans that present the worse dangers and show most lack of cooperation.
Yes, but they are not relevant to the floating bus stops, which is what the article was about.
While I always do give way to pedestrians crossing, I think they are a bloody stupid idea, and can see why not all cyclists do, particularly on very busy cycle lanes.