You Sir must see a doctor immediately. If the site of a Spitfire in full flight does not make your insides do funny things then you are not well.
If people didn't go on about them as if they single handed won the war then yes, I might just like them, but, I am afraid, there is WAY to much froth surrounding them for my liking (in fact you probably need a full drainage system surrounding one of the ruddy planes for all the dribble

).
Without that plane, (and the Hurricane) do not forget, you would now be conversing in German!
'Without *that* plane, we'd all be speaking German!'
The Hurricane did MOST of the work, took most of the loses, was easier and cheaper to produce and fix, could easily out turn both a Spitfire and a Mescherschmitt in flight and could start in much colder temperatures, therefore having the upper hand in just about every department, and yet, what do you always hear about?
Even during the war, there was a Spitfire Fund, but when they tried to do the same for the Hurricane, nobody gave a toss. I know the Spitfire was more advanced etc etc, but it is the everyday workmanlike Hurricane I respect, NOT the Spitfire.
The Spitfire was an expensive 'glamour plane'. The Hurricane just got on with it and did exactly what it said on the tin.
Nice, but yet again, give me a Wellington ANY day!


More Wimpy's produced than any other bomber right from 1939 - 45 don't you know.
How many are preserved out of those many, many thousands built?
2, a miserable stinking 2, and one of those is a wreck!
but it gets damp as soon as you put it in your mouth anyway!
But at least it isn't normally damp before you eat it. Sorry, I don't want to eat something resembling a wet carpet!
best bet is to smear the toast with Marmite before adding the beans
......
PERVERT!!