@KnittyNorah I know you cannot speak for the entire horse world, but are cyclists generally welcomed or hated by horse riders on the roads? In my experience I seem to have good relationships with horse riders, but I do meet a few very frosty ones.
Welcomed, very much welcomed. By me, and most of the people I know.
Most of us recognise that a cyclist has very similar interests and fears to us wrt traffic and roads; we have some different opinions about road surfaces but we each have strongly-aligned views about the dangers of potholes, slippery manhole covers, deep puddles, dodgy grids and general debris.
'Frosty' riders may well in actual fact be nervous about their horse's reaction to a cyclist - and so are doing the best they can to react in no way at all - or they might just be 'frosty' people.
I've come across cyclists like that, and other horse riders too. Especially when I used to have a mule ... hahaha! The NUMBER of silly people - cyclists, walkers and horseriders - who told me that I had to 'get off this path because that is a donkey'. I actually took legal advice and took to carrying copies of the relevant paragraphs about the law with me, dropping them off at livery stables and the like!
For several years I used to take two teenage lads with me when I took my horse out to ride different routes in the Peak District; the lads were keen mountain bikers and their parents gave me a contribution towards fuel. The abuse those boys to often had to put up with from
walkers was disgraceful. Two pleasant lads riding their bikes in a considerate way on bridlepaths where they were perfectly entitled to be. I confess I probably came across to several groups of walkers as somewhat more than 'frosty' on those occasions ... even if quite often the group I came across to as 'frosty' wasn't the one causing any problems for 'my lads' at all.
There
is fear and resentment about some cyclists, irresponsible MTB ers in particular. Fear because we are on a live thing who can't be mended if broken, and resentment because we (older horseriders) worked for a generation or more, post war, to reopen and maintain bridleways and reclassify old ways, we (generally) welcomed cyclists into 'the fold' as it were when the law on access was changed in 1968 - yet there has been surprisingly-little reciprocity, in fact the opposite - bridleways in some places were, in the 1990s, being 'improved' so as to be
less suitable for horses. Many of us who had worked in/for bridleways were enthusiastic supporters of Sustrans when it was founded; initially it seemed they were for true multi-user access and so when Sustrans got involved with bridleways organisations in the 1970s and 80s it seemed like it could only be a good thing. We feel that
Sustrans misled us and that has led, in the minds of some, to a general suspicion and resentment of cyclists. I suppose that attitudes are passed down from older to younger, and it's the old thing, people prefer to see differences and draw attention to those, rather than recognise and acknowledge similarities.