Police and the Bow Roundabout

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Paco de Bango

Active Member
Anyone who regularly uses the new "cyclist priority" lights at Bow roundabout, I just thought I'd let you know about an incident I had a couple of days ago.

I cycled through the cycle lane lights on green, into the ASZ then as I got to the front of the ASZ the lights changed so carried on over the stop line as it was changing from red/amber to green then onto the roundabout.

At this point a police car that had been waiting in the left hand car lane behind the ASZ sounded the horn, overtook me on the roundabout and pulled me over. A male & female officer got out and told me I'd just jumped 2 red lights. I was adamant that I hadn't, but was basically told to stop arguing or get given a ticket and at one point threatened with being handcuffed. So I stopped arguing, and was let off with a telling off as long as I admitted I jumped the lights and that I'd never do it again.

Not very interesting you may think, but this whole episode did wind me up a little so the next morning I decided to do some Sherlock Holmes style investigation and what I found out was mildly interesting.

During the whole incident the police car was stationary, waiting at the red light in the left hand lane just at the stop line behind the ASZ. From this point it's impossible to see the cycle lane lights, the only lights visible from a car in this position are all red, so it may look like a cyclist is bombing through red, but they aren't, because when the traffic lights for the cars are on red, the cycle lane lights are on green.

Then when I got to the front of the ASZ it's also impossible, from the police cars position, to see the amber and green lights of the early start lights. This is because they are steeply angled downwards to avoid confusing the drivers behind as these lights change a few seconds before the motor vehicles lights. So, again, all the drivers can see are red lights that a cyclist seemingly sets off under.

So there you go, innocent of all charges :whistle:. But some info worth noting for regular users if you ever get pulled over by police who think you've jumped a red.

I have written to the met police on this asking them to make sure their officers know how this junction works to avoid this happening again, but haven't received a response and aren't really expecting one.

I think in hindsight what I should have done was act confused and ask the police to walk back to the junction to show me how I was supposed to go through it. It certainly would've been worth it to see how they dealt with it. But when your being told by 2 police officers that you've broken the law, the tiniest seed of doubt suddenly grows and I just wanted to be let off.

Apologies if my descriptions are a bit confusing, I've got no idea how to post a picture of the junction and google street view still has the old layout.
 

Cycling Dan

Cycle Crazy
Me being be I would not have backed down especially if it meant I had to admit to something I didn't do, to my understanding as long as your not arrested you are not force to stay there(i could be and most likely wrong). I would have just said have a nice day and cycled on . If they given me a ticket I would have took it to court and contested and and then write a formal complaint along with claiming any costs it took to go through the process of contesting the ticket.
That's me though :biggrin:
 

Profpointy

Legendary Member
Me being be I would not have backed down especially if it meant I had to admit to something I didn't do, to my understanding as long as your not arrested you are not force to stay there(i could be and most likely wrong). I would have just said have a nice day and cycled on . If they given me a ticket I would have took it to court and contested and and then write a formal complaint along with claiming any costs it took to go through the process of contesting the ticket.
That's me though :biggrin:

That's fine until the police side of the story changes in court...
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
You'd think the police would know about the staggered cycle lights there though - it's not as though there's a lot of them around! Mind you, going through the second red and amber light might make it 1 - 1.;)
 
OP
OP
P

Paco de Bango

Active Member
Me being be I would not have backed down especially if it meant I had to admit to something I didn't do, to my understanding as long as your not arrested you are not force to stay there(i could be and most likely wrong). I would have just said have a nice day and cycled on . If they given me a ticket I would have took it to court and contested and and then write a formal complaint along with claiming any costs it took to go through the process of contesting the ticket.
That's me though :biggrin:
i started to do just that, at which point he grabbed my bike and told me he'll handcuff me if i tried that again.
getting a ticket and then contesting it is a great idea, but does anyone really want all that hassle hanging over them?
 

Cycling Dan

Cycle Crazy
i started to do just that, at which point he grabbed my bike and told me he'll handcuff me if i tried that again.
getting a ticket and then contesting it is a great idea, but does anyone really want all that hassle hanging over them?
Im not sure if it happened in this case(It sounds like it wasn't) but I would rather not have my details took and it be on record I jump lights.
 
OP
OP
P

Paco de Bango

Active Member
You'd think the police would know about the staggered cycle lights there though - it's not as though there's a lot of them around! Mind you, going through the second red and amber light might make it 1 - 1.;)
thats where the seed of doubt came from. i thought maybe my front wheel went overr the line before it changed green, but thats a harsh rlj to go chasing someone for.

i think its the only one in london? some irony that the only junction that gives cyclists priority and he pulls one over for getting away first. what amazed me was his rant about how tfl has spent all this money on this junction "to stop cyclists doing what you just did". i was very tempted to tell him thats exactly what its designed for, but i had already had my 2 strikes by this point and didn't fancy a ticket.
 
I'm not sure you would get any costs back from the police if you were found not guilty and not stopping when asked to is a sure fire way of getting arrested!
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
thats where the seed of doubt came from. i thought maybe my front wheel went overr the line before it changed green, but thats a harsh rlj to go chasing someone for.

i think its the only one in london? some irony that the only junction that gives cyclists priority and he pulls one over for getting away first. what amazed me was his rant about how tfl has spent all this money on this junction "to stop cyclists doing what you just did". i was very tempted to tell him thats exactly what its designed for, but i had already had my 2 strikes by this point and didn't fancy a ticket.
Yes, the irony had occurred to me too. Shame you don't know which station the officer was out of.
 

Cycling Dan

Cycle Crazy
I'm not sure you would get any costs back from the police if you were found not guilty and not stopping when asked to is a sure fire way of getting arrested!
I googled it and the police need reasonable grounds to suspect you’re involved in a crime for which your arrest is necessary. In this case if they supect you of jumping the lights they can arrest you if you leave however this is just a quick google. Im sure there is some right you have to leave.... i will try and find it. I suspect this is an american thing i am recalling now im googling.
Also you can sue everyone and anyone so i don't see why you couldn't.
However the cycle off comment was based on that this right exists, in reality i would have just argued with them until the crack of dawn if i knew I hadn't jumped a light.
 
I googled it and the police need reasonable grounds to suspect you’re involved in a crime for which your arrest is necessary. In this case if they supect you of jumping the lights they can arrest you if you leave however this is just a quick google. Im sure there is some right you have to leave.... i will try and find it. I suspect this is an american thing i am recalling now im googling.
Also you can sue everyone and anyone so i don't see why you couldn't.
However the cycle off comment was based on that this right exists, in reality i would have just argued with them until the crack of dawn if i knew I hadn't jumped a light.

Ok, good luck with that.
 
I googled it and the police need reasonable grounds to suspect you’re involved in a crime for which your arrest is necessary. In this case if they supect you of jumping the lights they can arrest you if you leave however this is just a quick google. Im sure there is some right you have to leave.... i will try and find it. I suspect this is an american thing i am recalling now im googling.
Also you can sue everyone and anyone so i don't see why you couldn't.
However the cycle off comment was based on that this right exists, in reality i would have just argued with them until the crack of dawn if i knew I hadn't jumped a light.

Let's leave aside the fact the OP was innocent. This doesn't actually apply to our power of arrest (which is where a lot of people get annoyed!).

We have to SUSPECT an offence has been committed and SUSPECT you are guilty of it. Both parts met in this scenario, they THOUGHT you went through a red light.

They then have to justify an arrest on a list of 'necessity reasons'. Google it for the whole list. The commonly used ones are 'for a prompt and effective investigation', 'to prevent harm to [someone]’, and 'to protect a child and vulnerable person'. None of them apply in this case.

The one they could have used if you'd have decided to ride off and they wanted to push it was that they were unable to ascertain your name and address. This does give a power of arrest, if you (having met the first part regarding the offence and suspicion of it being you) fail to give them, or we suspect you've lied. Once you've given your details, if the address is suitable for a summons to be served, that's the point in this scenario where you could effectively ride off, saying "You know who I am, I don't agree I've committed an offence, send me to court if you like".

Just to clarify it before it does up, you never HAVE to give your details to us unless we suspect an offence.
 
From what I've heard some Police do depend on ignorance of the law or are ignorant themselves, I think one officer on here even got a talking to from a younger officer about a traffic offence which wasn't overly correct.
Unless you have a witness or camera to back you up, most people are going to believe two officers, aren't they?

Are Police officers taught a "script" to make an arrest go their way if it gets to court? You know, certain key phrases that will sound damning if read in court?
 
Top Bottom