Chonker
Veteran
- Location
- Buckingham
Aurélien Bonneteau leads the pack by Watson House, on Flickr
This picture always brings a smile to my face
Race eligibility
- Thread starter Browser
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Aurélien Bonneteau leads the pack by Watson House, on Flickr
This picture always brings a smile to my face
henshaw11
Well-Known Member
- Location
- Walton-On-Thames
Indeed, but it's still a defined type, and not that far adrift from nonTT bikes. The fact that timetrials feature separate riders eliminates the sort of safety concerns that might be present otherwise, but why *should* they change them to allow 'bents ? You wouldn't insist that footballers are allowed to pick up the ball, would you? No, 'cos there's rugby and aussie rules football...
byegad
Legendary Member
- Location
- NE England
What's interesting is the UCI's record on resisting change. gears, of any kind nearly didn't get into their rule book. Moulton's small wheels were banned in the 1960s. The hour is a good example of where innovations could be found. Until Obree went 'too far'! Now you go back to the future as far as the bike allowed for this event is concerned.
Mr Haematocrit
msg me on kik for android
- Location
- Out of the saddle
I would not wish to see F1 cars and touring cars go head to head, equally I would not like to see time trail bikes in a road race. The fact the UCI have accommodated different bikes is not debated but they are correct to keep them seperate from one another, one type of bike or vehicle may have an advantage is certain situations and you want to see the best rider obtain sucess. Where would you draw the line I expect many people can not think of an valid objection to using electrically assisted bikes.
Race like with like, bents should race bents, f1 against f1, horses against horses.... The interest is to see who is best under the rules stated against similar machinery. I would quickly loose interest in pro racing if it became a run what you brung event.
black'n'yellow
Guest
Aurélien Bonneteau leads the pack by Watson House, on Flickr
This picture always brings a smile to my face
It brings a smile to my face too - but for the wrong reasons, probably. That's a sportive - not a proper race. Can you imagine that poor fecker in the middle of the bunch....coming up to a fast corner...?? Think about it....
I cringe whenever I see one on the road. Total abominations for circus use only...
byegad
Legendary Member
- Location
- NE England
BUT. Mochet's 1930s version did lead the pack in several professional races. AND the rider was not a top rider. But the peloton couldn't pass him.
See for yourself. http://www.recumbents.com/wisil/misc/velocar.htm
See for yourself. http://www.recumbents.com/wisil/misc/velocar.htm
tongskie01
Active Member
- Location
- blackpool england
bents are innovations in bicycle design which is still improving while diamond frame bicycle has reached its limit. we wouldn't really see which design is superior til we allow them to race each other in the professional level.
black'n'yellow
Guest
Just read it - there's a difference between leading the pack momentarily and winning a race. You say they couldn't pass him - they were probably waiting for the next climb while enjoying the tow he was giving them..
The article sums it up really - he couldn't keep pace going uphill and couldn't work with others in a paceline. They would be a liability in any 'conventional' road or circuit race.
Mr Haematocrit
msg me on kik for android
- Location
- Out of the saddle
Downhill mountain bikes are an innovation as well, do you think bents should be racing these as well at professional level?
What evidence do you have to support your statement that diamond frame bicycle design has reached its limit. Traditionally the frames used today are made to comply with the UCI rules as they stand. This is no evidence that the design has reached its limits, even within the rules innovations have been made such as those seen on the trek donone.
Allowing two different machines to race does not prove which is superior, if you took a F1 car and raced on gravel against a WRC car, the F1 car would loose as they were built to different rules and for different purpose.
tongskie01
Active Member
- Location
- blackpool england
sorry but your comparison doesnt make sense. were talking about road bikes here. based on logic you wouldn't race a machine if you think its inferior to others since the goal is to win. regarding diamond frame design, its unchanged til now. improved frame materials? yes, but other than that nothing has changed to diamond frame design.
black'n'yellow
Guest
are you seriously advocating that recumbents should be allowed to race alongside 'conventional' machines..??
NotthatJasonKenny
Faster on HFLC
- Location
- Bolton
Shouldn't all racing be on a level playing field as possible? You wouldn't want to see an F1 car entered into formula ford?
Mr Haematocrit
msg me on kik for android
- Location
- Out of the saddle
No I think you should not race one machine against another if it offers a potential advantage based on its design alone, I would not wish to see a F1 car race against a Foruma Ford as it proves nothing with regards to who is the best driver or who has the best vehicle. They were made for different rule sets and budgets.
The reason why bents do not race traditional bikes is that they do not conform or present a compeditive alternative with the UCI rules as they currently stand, comply with the rules first and then you have the start of a debate.
byegad
Legendary Member
- Location
- NE England
Given the scepticism shown ere about the competitiveness of bents... What is anyone afraid of? If they'll be so slow up hills that they can't win a race what is the issue?
black'n'yellow
Guest
Safety is the issue. Have you ever been in a road race bunch? 70 riders on conventional bikes, plus one on a recumbent, in the middle of the pack, with a field of vision at least 4ft lower than everyone else. Don't make me spell it out.....