Race eligibility

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

tongskie01

Active Member
My dear chap, the comparison is entirely valid as it relates as much to tyre dimension, wheelbase, seat height, frontal area and ride height as it does to any mechanical power source.

It is a matter of the proponents of one mechanical solution feeling they ought to be able to use their machinery of choice in a competition run by the proponents of another.

And I take it you are jesting in your last point... Of course there is such a thing as a proper bicycle. I ride one. I believe Bradley, Cadel, Andre, Thor and Fabian ride them too.

I hope your wish for every major manufacturer to build and sell recumbents comes to be. It is a good and noble wish. I might even buy one myself.

Meanwhile the Tour, the Giro, the Vuelta and sundry other races will continue to be ridden on proper bicycles.

sorry, but i tried to google "proper bicycle" and cannot find one.....:sad::smile:
 

Chonker

Veteran
Location
Buckingham
People see uprights as 'proper' bikes because that's what the pros ride, the pros ride them because that's what the rules allow. The rules are there to level the playing field and changing them would see a few years of anarchy with the best engineering and not necessarily the best athlete doing well, until the dust settled and the optimum engineering solution was well understood. At this point things would continue as they are now but with the new engineering solution.

I'm not saying that engineering solution is a recumbent mind, but it seems unlikely it's what the UCI spec either. It's hard to really understand the performance of other bike designs as you don't get the same level of athlete competing on 'bents because you can't make a living from it, because you can't race them due to the UCI ban.

Either way I see it like this, if I want to build a quick car for a hillclimb/trackday, with no intention of competing in the WRC, then I wont bother building it to WRC rules (34mm restrictor on the turbo, screw that!). I'm not going to be competing in any UCI events anytime soon so why restrict myself to the UCI rules?
 
everyone could be riding it now. but its coming back slowly.

'Everyone', you say. What about BMXers, mountain bikers (especially downhillers) and - (and this is my personal favourite) - cyclocross riders..?? Would love to see recumbent CX....anyone got any pics..??
 

tongskie01

Active Member
'Everyone', you say. What about BMXers, mountain bikers (especially downhillers) and - (and this is my personal favourite) - cyclocross riders..?? Would love to see recumbent CX....anyone got any pics..??
on time trials? anyway here you go.
View: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ekefr3xH3y8
 
on time trials? anyway here you go.

sorry, you may have misunderstood. I said CX, or MTB, or BMX - especially CX, where dismount, portage and re-mount is a critical factor. I didn't say anything about forest trails, dirt roads or grass. I think even I could manage that on one of those things.
 
some more

That speaks for itself really - it was painful to watch...especially the bits where the bike had to be lifted back on to the trail again... :laugh:

However, I was thinking something more like this really...



BTW - watch the 'rope swing face plant' clip afterwards - it's even funnier than the recumbent MTB...
 

tongskie01

Active Member
That speaks for itself really - it was painful to watch...especially the bits where the bike had to be lifted back on to the trail again... :laugh:

However, I was thinking something more like this really...



BTW - watch the 'rope swing face plant' clip afterwards - it's even funnier than the recumbent MTB...

i watched that too. anyway the "everyone" comment was meant for the time trials. upright bikes at the moment is best for climbing...:smile: i wathced that thing a while ago. funny. and i did fly over the bars before when the carrier bag i was holding got sucked into my front wheel. lucky it was uphill and landed on my arms and knees.
 
Top Bottom