GrumpyGregry
Here for rides.
Copenhagen and Stockholm.And pretty much everywhere. No idea where cph or sthlm are.
You get bored typing them out over and over.
Last edited:
Copenhagen and Stockholm.And pretty much everywhere. No idea where cph or sthlm are.
What pollutes less:Very relevant, because YOU mentioned your desire not to be an environmental moton(sic), yet seem oblivious to all the environmental damage you're responsible for simply getting itself there. Why do you avoid the issue of your environmental double standards?
No extras, second driver included, free baby seats if you want them. I've given the links and reviews so 14e is real if you check. But you didn't did you? Why, oh why am I having a problem getting people to accept there is an issue. Namely in some places shops can hire out bikes economically yet profitably. Other places it is a rip-off. And it will remain a rip-off if people are willing to pay it.The alternative to hiring a bike is flying your own out there which is pretty expensive hence they charge what the market will bear. There is more competition for hire cars hence the market has driven prices lower, especially in off season when all the operators have cars stood around idle. Car hire has lots of hidden costs - refuel in charge, admin charge extra driver charge insurance waiver charge so your €14 a day is artificially low anyway.
Are you part of the problem?
I think the bit in bold is the flaw in your argument. As others have pointed out, the car rental company has very limited maintenance costs, and gets its raw material effectively for free. The bike rental company has high maintenance costs and pays pretty nearly full wholesale price for its raw material, which it has to write off completely after one season at most.A reminder again. It costs 14e a day to rent a car value ~ 8,000e. It costs 12e a day to rent a bike value ~ 250e. The overheads and other costs will be very much higher for the car rental company than the bike shop. Both are seeking a profit. The bike shops are either grossly profiteering or are extremely inefficient or a combination of both. That's the issue that with respect I haven't seen an answer for here.
The rolling maintenance cost and overheads are much much higher for the car rental business.
Beating a lone drum doesn't mean he is wrong. The 14€ (8000€) vs 12€ (250€) is interesting. The rolling maintenance cost and overheads are much much higher for the car rental business. Not sure why someone suggested otherwise.
Couple of possible reasons
- Bike rentals business is not really viable in the long term.
- Supply is short of demand and most business would rationally set the price based on demand
- More prone to bike thefts and non-returns.
Could you detail these. Typically the car rental companies will perform no maintenance other than a valet. The cars are moved on long before they need servicing. I could see overheads being larger, but then they will typically be dealing with many more rentals on a daily basis. Plus as noted before, there are many ways to add extras, from insane fuel prices, insurance rip offs, charging the for child seats, ridiculous charges for minor damage, additional charges on top of speeding/parking tickets etc.