True, most of our laws are decent, but changes to the status quo are near impossible to achieve if you are in a minority.
I think in this case we are more likely to get a change in the law if more people break the law (call it a protest if you will) and they may see that its safer==cheaper to change the law to accomodate. If everyone stops at red lights only a small amount of the minority would campaign for the change, but no-one'll think theres a need to change the law as no-ones actively doing it.
Personally I'm not fussed either way but if I did want change I could only see it happening through the above.
It is difficult to change legislation and I think rightfully so.
I can't see that giving people carte blanche to RLJ would be safe and it's one of those things that has to be either allowed or not, it can't be based on the subjective situation because there are way too many variables.
Saying that, the current law is largely unenforced and I don't think the police could care less about it, I see cyclists doing it under their noses all; the time and they don't even raise an eyebrow.
There is an argument for getting rid of traffic lights altogether but I'm not sure the populace at large can be trusted
