atbman said:This does sound rather like radar gun "victims" complaining about the police not chasing real criminals and they only speed when it's safe to do so.
On the face of it, yes, it does. Yet there is a crucial difference; speeding harms people. Measurably, seriously, and frequently. Cyclists RLJing doesn't. So a cyclist being collared for this can rightly say 'but its doing no real harm', whereas a speeding motorist can't.
Even tho' I agree that drivers RLJ far more dangerously than cyclists, since they do it at speed, whereas riders generally choose a "safe" gap to go thro'
Don't get me wrong, in principle I'm totally in favour of stopping RLJing cyclists. I just can't see any reasonable justification for spending money and resources on something that should rationally be so far down the list.