Rucksack lights-very poor.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

winjim

Straddle the line, discord and rhyme
Saw a cyclist tonight with only a front light at head height, and noticed that it took that little bit longer to recognise him as a cyclist, as there weren't any lights lower down. It probably didn't help that we were going uphill and he was going down so exaggerating the height of the light.
Whilst driving I saw an oncoming car pull out into my lane which I thought was a bit odd. It was only on a second look that I noticed the cyclist they were overtaking. The cyclist had a helmet light only but because I was scanning the road at the height I would normally expect to see a front light I had totally failed to see them.
 

I like Skol

A Minging Manc...
Not rucksack light related but now we are in the darker half of the year I can't help noticing the general poor or non-existent level of lighting employed by some riders. Just on my last commute I encountered a rider who had a matching pair of lights mounted on his handlebars, this is good, except they were so dim that even when quite close up they looked like little more than a distant light reflecting off some chrome!

In total contrast, several times I have encountered a rider/commuter in the wee small hours that has a bit of a light fetish going on. He has a front and rear helmet light, two good bright lights mounted on his handle bars, a rear light on the seat post, a rear light on his rucksack, green flashing LEDs around his elbows and red flashing LRDs around his knees! It makes me feel quite Christmassy every time I see him (And you definitely see him!) I can't help but think that this is slight overkill and I for one couldn't be bothered with the faff of setting up all those lights everytime I headed out on the bike.....
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
I'm (pretty) sure that from a legal standpoint, you must have lights fixed to the bike anyway?
Yes. Table III of http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1989/1796/schedule/1/made applies to the vehicle not the rider. Note also that it needs to be fitted central or off-side, not on the kerb side - the same applies to the headlight, which sometimes surprises people with single chainrings who often seem to put the light on the opposite side to the gear lever.
 

I like Skol

A Minging Manc...
upload_2014-11-17_10-50-2.png
 

steveindenmark

Legendary Member
:thumbsup: I never ride without front and rear lights on. Rechargeable batteries keep the costs down.

I have just changed to a dynamo hub. It it is even better.
 

sheffgirl

Senior Member
Location
Sheffield
You should ride with panniers not a rucksack. Whats the point of wearing a reflective hi viz jacket then sticking a dark coloured rucksack on your back covering all this?

Lights should be on your bike.
I got a cheap rucksack with a big reflective patch on. I wanted a new bag and one of those Hump covers,but ended up with this, and saved money :smile:. It glows well, has been commented on on night rides :smile:
 

steveindenmark

Legendary Member
If you put a light on your rucksack you need someone behind you to tell you it is visible from a distance. Most often it is easier to put a light up near the top handle of a rucksack. But it would really be better placed lower down. Unless you are trying to attract the attention of low flying jets.
 
Top Bottom