Saddened by ninja

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

PK99

Legendary Member
Location
SW19
2154007 said:
As a result we get this creeping pressure put upon us, the victims and potential victims of that danger, to make it easier for drivers to go about the place as fast as they feel like and paying as little attention as they can.

A ninja cyclist is a danger to other cyclists and to pedestrians
 

Davidsw8

Senior Member
Location
London
2154260 said:
You would be interested in figures? Scroll back a page and read where you posted a firm opinion about this.

Hmm, so me saying 'I THINK way fewer drivers drive badly than cyclists cycle badly.' equates to a 'firm opinion'? Try not to misrepresent me if you can Adrian, thank you.

I've been very clear that this is only my opinion based on my own experience. I was merely stating an interest in some nearly impossible to gather statistics on this.

People here appear to be stating that everyone is as bad as each other, and some saying motorists are way worse. This is something that I don't recognise from my personal experience and I'm curious to understand why others think differently.
 

PK99

Legendary Member
Location
SW19
2154031 said:
Whereas drivers routinely behave badly but this doesn't reflect badly on them as a group.

But motorists do not, as a group, attempt to claim the high moral ground. A significant number of cyclists do absolutely attempt to claim the high moral ground - you included it would appear from your posts here.
Anyone claiming the high moral ground put upon themselves a higher duty to behave responsibly.
 

Davidsw8

Senior Member
Location
London
As I said in an earlier post. If you want a sample of law breaking frequency, just spend 5 min watching an electronic speed checking device. You'll get your answer.

Stand by the crossing opposite Kennington Tube for 10 minutes and I guarantee you'll see a much much larger % of cyclists RLJ than you will motorists doing the same.
 

PK99

Legendary Member
Location
SW19
2154041 said:
I wouldn't go as far as absolute evil but your phrase "necessary evil" does illustrate the problem. A large number of people actually believe that that necessity exists, when what it really is is a matter of choice.

I chose to drive today, i drove an elderly patient to a hospice (something i do every week) without volunteer transport the hospice day service could not function. Your "two wheels good, four wheels bad " stance is just too ridiculous for words
 

Recycle

Über Member
Location
Caterham
Stand by the crossing opposite Kennington Tube for 10 minutes and I guarantee you'll see a much much larger % of cyclists RLJ than you will motorists doing the same.
I didn't say you wouldn't and I am not going to defend it. My point was that cyclists are no worse than motorists in breaking the law and public opinion disproportionately favours the motorist. Mostly because motorists don't perceive their own actions as anti-social and they hugely outnumber cyclists in the make-up of public opinion.

The perception is massively unbalanced.
 

Davidsw8

Senior Member
Location
London
I didn't say you wouldn't and I am not going to defend it. My point was that cyclists are no worse than motorists in breaking the law and public opinion disproportionately favours the motorist. Mostly because motorists don't perceive their own actions as anti-social and they hugely outnumber cyclists in the make-up of public opinion.

The perception is massively unbalanced.

Sorry, I didn't mean to seem narky...
 

Recycle

Über Member
Location
Caterham
Sorry, I didn't mean to seem narky...
We all get a bit over-defensive on this.
I have divided opinions when there is a blitz on cyclists. On the one hand I'm irritated at being blamed for what others cyclists do, but I also get pissed of when I see law resources used to crack down on cyclists when I get routinely buzzed by close overtakes, and ignored when I complain.
 

Davidsw8

Senior Member
Location
London
We all get a bit over-defensive on this.
I have divided opinions when there is a blitz on cyclists. On the one hand I'm irritated at being blamed for what others cyclists do, but I also get ****ed of when I see law resources used to crack down on cyclists when I get routinely buzzed by close overtakes, and ignored when I complain.

Don't be disheartened by being ignored with complaints, it's worth pursuing. I complained about a van driver who drove through 2 red lights whilst on his phone, I had the incident on camera and contacted the company AND RoadSafe London. Both the company and the Met have got back to me and told me they've issued the driver with written warnings and that he'll be in it up to his neck if he does anything like it again (not in so many words ^_^ )
 

Davidsw8

Senior Member
Location
London
2154371 said:
Undoubtedly. How significant a danger are they? How many pedestrians have been mown down by ninja cyclists in the last x years do you think?

Do we need some KSI's before anything is done about an illegal activity?
 

400bhp

Guru
Don't be disheartened by being ignored with complaints, it's worth pursuing. I complained about a van driver who drove through 2 red lights whilst on his phone, I had the incident on camera and contacted the company AND RoadSafe London. Both the company and the Met have got back to me and told me they've issued the driver with written warnings and that he'll be in it up to his neck if he does anything like it again (not in so many words ^_^ )

I know it's difficult to do anything substantial in terms of prosecution but those type of words from authorities and employers always sound like [monty python life of brian esque] "he's been a very naughty boy". Just words that don't resonate too loudly with me i'm afraid.
 

400bhp

Guru
2154380 said:
No clearly not. After all it is much more pressing to rid the roads of a small number of ninja cyclists, where there is little to no evidence of any great danger to any third party, than it is to get to grips with the behaviors of a significant number of people in other groups who represent demonstrable risk to others.

Is it?
 

Davidsw8

Senior Member
Location
London
I know it's difficult to do anything substantial in terms of prosecution but those type of words from authorities and employers always sound like [monty python life of brian esque] "he's been a very naughty boy". Just words that don't resonate too loudly with me i'm afraid.

I dunno, if I got a letter from the Met telling me 'one more strike and you're out', I'd be incentivised to toe the line from there on in, or maybe I just scare easily.

I guarantee that van driver never dreamed he'd be reported let alone be captured on camera and put on YouTube ^_^ Funny thing was, I saw his van parked up a couple of days later so I'm guessing he drives a similar area quite regularly so I'll be keeping an eye out for any future problems....
 

Davidsw8

Senior Member
Location
London
2154380 said:
No clearly not. After all it is much more pressing to rid the roads of a small number of ninja cyclists, where there is little to no evidence of any great danger to any third party, than it is to get to grips with the behaviors of a significant number of people in other groups who represent demonstrable risk to others.

I sense a hint of sarcasm Adrian :becool:

So, anything goes as long as people don't die? hah! I don't subscribe to that way of thinking, if something is illegal, it needs to be enforced. If not, make it legal.
 

400bhp

Guru
2154392 said:
You tell me. How important is this problem in the grand scheme of things?

Not very

I don't think anyone has commented on the relative importance of it have they? Apart from you and your answers.
 
Top Bottom