OP
OP
User169
Guest
I know you never like to pass up an opportunity to patronise us mere mortals, but if you re-read my post you'll note I made no comment about the taste of sake.
I think FM meant to refer back to Reg' post.
I know you never like to pass up an opportunity to patronise us mere mortals, but if you re-read my post you'll note I made no comment about the taste of sake.
I know you never like to pass up an opportunity to patronise us mere mortals, but if you re-read my post you'll note I made no comment about the taste of sake.
It is possible to dislike a drink without it being evidence of intellectual inferiority.DP is right, it was Reg I was supposed to be replying too. And in any case, I can't see what you found patronising about my post... I was trying to get across the joy of sake.
You're a dinosaur?Every Laphroaig drinker is an intellectual tyrannosaurus
It is possible to dislike a drink without it being evidence of intellectual inferiority.
whatever treacle.I'm really not going to have an argument with you based on a mistaken interpretation of a mistakenly directed post. You can carry on if it makes you happy.