Kaipaith said:
I am reminded of a University student I studied with who refused to partake on a discussion about slavery for ethical reasons. I do question whether she actually felt offended by the idea of slavery, or if she felt she should be and completely misplaced the appropriate response to it.
That's bizzarre! If you feel slavery is abhorrant, you should be prepared to stand up and say so. Conversely, if you don't, you should be prepared to defend that point of view....
I'm reminded now (to slightly shift tack) of a talk given in our department, by a member of staff who'd been involved in a project studying attitudes to the history of slavery - her specialisms being archaeological ethics and heritage presentation. She waffled on interminably about the questions answered by visitors to a slavery exhibition, and the rather dubious 'statistics' they'd applied (while clearly having little idea about sample sizes and significance), and the racial make up of the
surveyees, but never once mentioned the racial mix of the
surveyors, which I though might have been interesting for the effect it might have on the answers given. Also, they'd asked people to write down their opinions, and then collated them into categories, rather than give categories for people to tick - she reckoned this made it more 'real', but didn't seem to take into account that there is still a process of categorisation, and again, what are the ethnic backgrounds of those interpreting the remarks?
The point being, that all the students involved, as far as I know, were white.